Class notes

International Trade and Finance Weekly Class Notes

4 views 0 purchase

Course
BUS73000

This course examines various concepts and applications of international trade, finance, and investment, and highlights the implications for the economy and businesses. Students gain insight into the benefits of free trade in goods/services and in resources across national borders. Notwithstanding t...

[Show more]

Preview 4 out of 226 pages

View example

Uploaded on August 25, 2023
Number of pages 226
Written in 2023/2024
Type Class notes
Professor(s) N/a
Contains All classes

weekly notes
class notes
economics
business
trade
finance
international trade and finance
bachelors of business administration

AndreaMcDonald Member since 1 year 4 documents sold

CA$21.67

Added

Add to cart Add to wishlist

100% satisfaction guarantee
Immediately available after payment
Both online and in PDF
No strings attached

WEEK 1
Chapter 1: International Economics is Different

What is a Nation?
● The existence of nations makes international economics distinct from the rest of
economics
● International economics is about economic relations among nations
● However, nations are sovereign, which is critical
○ No central court can enforce its will on nations with a global police force
● A nation can ignore the interests of foreigners
● A nation can have:
○ Its own currency (own exchange rate and monetary policy)
○ Its own barriers to international trade (trade policy)
○ Its own government taxing and spending (own fiscal policy)
○ Its own laws of citizenship and residence (own immigration policy)

Four Controversies
● Four controversial developments that frame the scope of what we will learn in
international economics
○ Trade War of 2018
○ Immigration
○ Brexit
○ China’s exchange rate regime
● We will use these issues to outline key ideas and concepts of international
economics

The Trade War of 2018
● By mid-2018, the United States had instigated a trade war.
● Trade deficits (e.g., with China, Mexico & other countries) were used as evidence
to support arguments for protectionist tariffs & U.S. withdrawal from, or
renegotiation of, trade agreements.
● In January 2017, the United States:
○ Withdrew from the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP)
○ Launched U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) investigations
● In 2018, USITC concluded that rising imports had harmed U.S. firms in several
industries.
● As a result, the U.S. imposed (temporary) safeguard tariffs ( > 30%) on imports of
washing machines & solar panels.

, ● The US Department of Commerce (USDC) found that imports of steel &
aluminum threatened national security.
● Concerns that steel & aluminum imports threatened national security resulted in
tariffs on steel imports of 25% & 10% on imports of aluminum.
● Initially, temporary exemptions were granted on imports of these products from
Canada, Mexico, the European Union (EU), Argentina, Australia, Brazil & South
Korea.
● Under the threat of tariffs, South Korea & Argentina agreed to voluntarily limit
their exports (i.e., to a VER) and Brazil agreed to quotas on its exports.
● In June of 2018, the U.S. ended the temporary exemptions & imposed tariffs on
steel and aluminum from all countries, except Australia.

● In response to U.S. tariffs, exporting countries imposed retaliatory tariffs on U.S.
exports.
● In March of 2018, the U.S. threatened to impose tariffs on Chinese imports to
retaliate against a range of unfair trade policies & practices towards U.S.
intellectual property.
● China threatened retaliatory tariffs to counter U.S. threats.
● The U.S. brought a complaint against China to the World Trade Organization
(WTO), alleging violation of intellectual property rules.
● In July of 2018, the trade war escalated, with the U.S. imposing tariffs on imports
from China and China retaliating.

● What are the expected results of the imposition of tariffs by the United States &
retaliation by other countries?
○ Impediments to free trade impact producers & consumers in exporting and
importing countries, as well as the world as a whole.
○ Economic analysis concludes that trade is a positive-sum activity (rather
than a zero-sum activity) and both countries generally gain from trade ↔
recall theory of comparative advantage.
○ Economic analysis also suggests that the overall trade balance, rather tan
the trade balance with individual countries is what matters.

Immigration
● About 260 million people, about 3% of the world’s population, live outside the
country of their birth.
● For most industrialized countries – the exception is Japan – the percentage of
the country’s foreign-born population is relatively high, ranging from 13% for the
United States to 29% for Switzerland.
● In addition, this proportion has generally been rising → controversy.

, ● Many of the foreign-born are illegal immigrants—over one-quarter of the total for
the U.S.
● Immigration policies have been set in place to restrict and reduce immigration.
● There have been several failed efforts to comprehensively reform immigration
policies in the United States

● Opponents of immigration stress a range of problems they believe arise from
immigration, including:
○ General losses to the economy
○ The fiscal burden from immigrants’ use of government services (e.g.,
health care, schooling, etc.)
○ Slow integration of immigrants into the new national culture, values, and
language
○ Potential of increased crime
○ Links of some immigrants to terrorism
● How much harm do immigrants do to the receiving country? What do we think?

● Job-seeking immigration brings net economic benefits, not only to the
immigrants, but to the receiving country as a whole.
● However, there are always winners and losers.
○ Winners include the firms that employ the immigrants & consumers who
buy the products.
○ The group that loses is the workers who compete with the immigrants for
jobs.
○ The net effect is positive – the winners win more than the losers lose.

Brexit
● In June 2016, voters in the United Kingdom (UK) voted 52% to 48% to leave the
European Union (EU) → narrow margin.
● Key features of the EU are:
○ Customs union, which eliminates tariffs between EU members & imposes
a common external tariff (CET)
○ Single market which promotes free movement of goods & services,
financial capital & people among EU members, and
○ Common currency (the Euro) & common monetary policy (implemented by
the ECB)

● Differences in the “Brexit” vote were geographic:
○ London, Scotland and Northern Ireland voted to remain in the EU.
○ The rest of England (outside London) and Wales voted to leave the EU.

, ● Differences in the “Brexit” vote were demographic:
○ Younger and more educated people voted to remain.

● Proponents of “stay” stressed economic benefits to the UK of EU membership.
○ Net benefits from trade, immigration from other EU countries & the
dominance of London as a financial center
● Proponents of “leave” stressed re-establishment of British sovereignty.
○ Ability to set own policies
○ Ability to control immigration
○ Use contributions to EU for its own use

● Challenges for Britain & the rest of the EU to resolve:
○ What will be the status of the border between Northern Ireland (part of the
UK) & Ireland? Note: the island of Ireland (Northern Ireland & Ireland)
functions as one economy.
○ What tariffs & customs procedures will exist for trade between Britain and
the EU?
○ Will there be differences in product regulations & standards between
Britain & the EU, and how will these apply to trade?
○ Will there be new barriers to trade in services? Specifically, to what extent
can London banks continue to sell financial services to EU firms and
residents?
○ Will Britain be able to negotiate its own free-trade agreements with outside
countries?
○ Will Britain continue to benefit from the more than 35 free-trade
agreements the EU has with other countries?
○ What policies will oversee migration between Britain & the EU?
○ To what extent will Britain continue to pay the EU?

● Options for Britain in leaving the EU:
○ A ‘hard Brexit’ – complete break with the EU – which might be disruptive
to British companies, industries & jobs.
○ A ‘soft Brexit’ – e.g., Britain shifts to customs union with the EU & accepts
many ‘single-market’ rules but is not formally an EU member – which
allows for much less sovereignty. Britain would have no formal role in
enacting or changing EU laws & regulations.

China’s Exchange Rate
● An exchange rate is value of a country’s currency in terms of some other
country’s currency (e.g., US$/C$ = US$0.83).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card or Stuvia-credit for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller AndreaMcDonald. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for CA$21.67. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77764 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy study notes for 14 years now

Start selling

Class notes

International Trade and Finance Weekly Class Notes

Document information

Subjects

Written for

Seller

Reviews received

Content preview