100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Gross Negligent Manslaughter £4.99   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Gross Negligent Manslaughter

 48 views  0 purchase

Summary of Gross Negligent Manslaughter with relevant case studies

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • May 14, 2021
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (18)
avatar-seller
MarieFR
Summary sheet - Gross Negligent Manslaughter



Gross Negligent manslaughter can be used to reduce a murder charge to Gross
Negligent Manslaughter (a form of Involuntary manslaughter). Involuntary
manslaughter is unlawful killing without malice aforethought. Meaning that there is
no requirement for intention to kill or the intention to cause grievous bodily harm
(GBH). Within involuntary manslaughter there are two types. The first being “gross
negligence manslaughter” and the second being “constructive/unlawful act of
Manslaughter”. Gross Negligent manslaughter is where the defendant looks like they
are acting lawfully and they can be an act or an omission. The main difference
between murder and manslaughter is the sentencing as Murder charges life in prison,
however involuntary manslaughter can charge up to absolute discharge with a
criminal record to life in prison.




To prove Gross Negligent manslaughter there is a three part criteria;

- Defendants own the Victim a duty of care.

- The duty of care was breached and caused the death.

- The level of negligence was ‘gross’ (very high)




The first criteria to be met ‘The defendant has own the victim of a duty of care” which
means that the defendant has a duty of care, which is usually in reference to a
circumstances and relationship where the law is recognised as giving a rise to a legal
duty to take care. The neighbour test was replaced by the ‘three part test’. The three
part critiar is:

1. Was the damage or harm reasonably foreseeable? (Kent v Griffiths (2000))

2. Is there a sufficiently proximate relationship between the claimant and the
defendant? (Hill v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire (1990) or Osman v
Ferguson (1993))




1

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MarieFR. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £4.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

73216 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£4.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart