Summary
Summary Complicity revision notes
- Module
- Criminal Law
- Institution
- The University Of Birmingham (UBir)
Complicity revision notes
[Show more]
Seller
FollowContent preview
COMPLICITYReferred to sometimes as ‘accomplice liability’ ‘parties to the crime’ ‘accessorial
liability’ ‘secondary parties’
Accessories and Abettors Act 1861, s.8:
“Whoever shall aid, abet, counsel, or procure the commission of any indictable offence … shall be
liable to be tried, indicted, and punished as a principal offender”
Terminology->
▪ Principal offence – this refers to the offence that D is aiding/abetting/counselling/procuring
(also referred to as the ‘substantive offence’, ‘full offence’, ‘future offence’)
▪ Principal offender (P) – the party who commits the actus reus with required mens rea
▪ Joint-principal – Multiple Ds complete the AR with required MR
▪ Principal via innocent agency – AR committed by uninformed third party (X) – D remains
liable as principal
▪ Accomplice – D does not complete AR of offence, but aids/abets/counsels/procures P to, and
P does complete AR (with MR)
- Uncertainty as to whether D is a principal or accomplice
Gnango 2011 -> 2 men in gunfight – Gnango and Bandana man, Bandana man aims to shoot
Gnango, but misses and shoots and kills innocent V, Bandana man is the principal offender (P) and
guilty of murder = Is D (Gnango) liable for murder too?
SC judgment (7 judge panel) ->
1. D = an accomplice (Phillips, Judge and Wilson)
2. D = principal offender (Clark)
3. D = joint principal (Brown, Clark, Dyson)
Lord Kerr: (dissenting)
Overall decision: D liable for murder … but on what grounds?!?!
Smith and Hogan 2017 -> Gnango (D) does not shoot V himself, Bandana man’s (P) shots are not
caused by Gnango (D) – they are P’s free and voluntary acts, D does not commit the AR for murder
so cannot be a principal offender or a co-principal/joint-principal
The principal offender commits the AR of the crime
Factual difficulties: principal or accomplice?
▪ D’s role in the principal offence is unclear
D1 and D2 both there – V dies – dispute about D2’s involvement
Gianetto [1997] as long as jury sure D2 either killed V himself as a principal or D2 encouraged
killing by D1 (was an accessory) can convict of murder
▪ Evidence places D at the scene, but it cannot be proven that D either committed as a
principal or an accomplice
D must be acquitted – even if case for all parties present (even though someone must have done it)
1) Actus Reus
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lucielaclie. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £6.29. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now