Summary
Summary Mens Rea notes
- Module
- Criminal Law
- Institution
- The University Of Birmingham (UBir)
Mens Rea summary notes for revision
[Show more]
Seller
FollowContent preview
MENS REACapacity -> Fault -> Conduct -> Defences -> Capacity -> etc…
1) Blame and responsibility
Act is not regarded as guilty unless the mind is guilty
Basic principle = conduct (or causing a consequence) alone should not be enough – also need
“blameworthiness” (exception Strict Liability) -> blameworthiness is predicated on “autonomy”
Different crimes = different mens rea
some crime doesn’t require guilty mind = not always guilty mind, it could be negligence or
recklessness, not always intention to kill, intention to harm the body is enough
Levels of culpability:
1. Intention -> intent can be essence of an offence, intent can be main way law grades offences,
different from motive, no statutory definition of intention
It’s a question of fact, applying subjective test with s8 Criminal Justice Act 1967
Direct intention = consequence was the aim, objective or purpose of D – D intends
consequence if he acts with aim or purpose of producing that consequence
Oblique/Indirect intention = virtually certain consequence of which D was aware it was
virtually certain to occur
2. Recklessness -> taking of unjustified risk, person may be reckless as to consequence/
circumstance, distinction from intention & negligence, only subjective recklessness
R v Cunningham: D charged under s23 OAPA 1861 of maliciously administering noxious
substances so as to endanger life
Test -> A person acts recklessly with regard to result when he is aware of a risk that it will
occur; and it is, in the circumstances known to him, unreasonable to take the risk
Objective test Caldwell??
3. Knowledge
4. Negligence -> Lot of crimes rely on negligence = looking for objective test
Consists of falling below standard of ordinary reasonable person. Test is objective, based on
hypothetical person, involves D either doing something reasonable person would not do, or
not doing something which reasonable person would do. Does not matter that D was
unaware that something dangerous might happen, if "reasonable person" would have
realised the risk, and taken steps to avoid it
2) Relationship between AR & MR
MR must exist at same time as AR
General principle has become increasingly flexible
a) Continuing offence approach
The D did AR at one point in time (without the MR) but at a later point had the MR
Fagan v Metropolitan Police -> for assault to be committed, both AR & MR must be present at
same time, not necessary that MR should be present at inception of AR
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lucielaclie. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £6.38. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now