100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
exclusion clauses tutorial work £7.49
Add to cart

Other

exclusion clauses tutorial work

 24 views  0 purchase

detailed, descriptive tutorial work to help improve grades and save time for law students

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • June 18, 2021
  • 3
  • 2020/2021
  • Other
  • Unknown
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (24)
avatar-seller
gxorgiaa
Andy has hired scaffolding from Secure Scaffolds approximately twice a month for
the past two years. Regulatory – business to business – sterling v bradshaw

in business to consumer – not lot of consistency is necessary
On the past 5 occasions, the invoice has had the following printed on the reverse:

“Secure Scaffolds shall not be liable for any loss or damage howsoever caused to
the customer’s premises and if, notwithstanding the foregoing, any liability for
damage to customer’s property shall arise, that liability shall be limited to a total of
£500.”

Andy telephones Secure Scaffolds and orders scaffolding to be delivered on the
following day.

Tom, an employee of Secure Scaffolds, negligently
section 2 – negligence liability

drives the delivery van into Andy’s wall, causing it to collapse onto Andy’s new van.
The wall costs £1000 to rebuild and the repairs to the van cost £1500.


Advise Andy, in the following two circumstances:

1. Where he is a builder hiring scaffolding for his commercial premises.
incorporated by notice – writing on invoice [olley case, parker v south
eastern railway – moment customer knows of writing, despite not
knowing details of it – will be bound by the terms unless other takes
steps to be bound]

unsure whether had reasonable steps taken

normally invoice don’t have contractual legalities – can argue that if ss
had taken reasonable steps to bring this to attention

not onerous term

british crane case – custom of trade, clause was incorporated

business to business – ucta 1977, reasonableness test

section 2 – negligency liability -

contra pro

Canada steamship case – said first thing, see if there is any expressed
exclusion of negligence, if not then need to see whether words are wide
to cover negligence – if so, decides that it covers that and not
negligence

if ambiguous – strict on parties who are strict

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gxorgiaa. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£7.49
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added