100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
A* essay response: Evaluate the to which congressional oversight of the president is ineffective (30) £8.48   Add to cart

Essay

A* essay response: Evaluate the to which congressional oversight of the president is ineffective (30)

3 reviews
 1613 views  14 purchases

A* response to a 30 mark question

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • June 25, 2021
  • 2
  • 2020/2021
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (48)

3  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: antmacd • 8 months ago

review-writer-avatar

By: georgewilson1 • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: vidhug • 2 year ago

avatar-seller
fatimaw777
Evaluate the extent to which congressional oversight of the president is ineffective
(30)

Congress’s oversight authority derives from its implied powers in the constitution.
The founding fathers made sure that no branch has supreme power than another
and so oversight is an integral part of the American system of checks and balances.
However, it can be argued that congress is not effective in the oversight of the
executive branch due to partisanship.The effectiveness of oversight merily depends
on the government formed; either a united or divided government and so ruins the
convention of effective oversight.

One method which congress uses to oversight, is voting in congress on proposed
legislation. Congress has the authority to vote against laws supported by the
president. Even though the president sets out legislation, it is Congress that
implements proposed legislation and therefore the executive is heavily dependent
on Congress for legislation to be passed. Though a president comes to office with a
working majority in Congress, he can still face difficulty. For example in 2010 when
Congress was dominated by the Democrats, Obama still faced difficulty in
implementing Obamacare and as a result, a significantly watered-down version
passed. With Congress being more polarised in recent years there has been a lack
of bipartisanship between legislature and executive, which is exactly what the
Founding Fathers wanted, and as a result Congress is effective in scrutinizing the
executive. However, the president still has many powers in his court which suggest
that oversight of the executive is not as effective as it should be. This can be seen
through the example of George W Bush, with a Republican congress, passing the
Patriot Act even though there were many claims of this being unconstitutional.
Furthermore, George W Bush also increased the use of Executive orders that did not
require congressional approval. Highlighting the fact that congress is not effective in
the role of oversight if there is a united government due to partisanship and
presidential power. Therefore, though congress may vote against legislations
supported by the president, this is not very likely especially in a united government
due to the fact that congress support president and the president may increase the
use of executive order, reducing the effective oversight of the president and making
it more ineffective.

Congress also uses congressional committees to oversight the president and the
executive. Congressional committees scrutinise the actions and legislations of the
executive branch. This can be seen as an effective way of oversight due to the fact
that congress can carry out intensive scrutiny and questioning of the executive
branch and make sure they are doing the correct work. For instance, when the
Democrats took over the congress for the final two years of Geaorge W Bush’s
presidency, four very high profile members of the executive branch resigned within
three week of relentless and critical questioning by congressional committees. This
can be seen as highly effective due to the fact that the executive are accountable to
congressional committees and so congressional committees are committed and
responsible in the effective oversight of the president and the executive. However it
can be argued that congress isn't as effective at its oversight role due to the fact that
congress favourtising the party of a president in a united government. For example,
the first five years of his presidency where congress was dominated by republicans ,
we see only 35 investigation hearings held in congress in comparison to his last two

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller fatimaw777. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £8.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75759 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£8.48  14x  sold
  • (3)
  Add to cart