Introduction
Key Words:
o Neuroethics = moral judgement e.g. the trolley dilemma = lots of activity in the
anterior cingulate cortex during conflict decisions.
o Neurotheology = religion e.g. Geschwind syndrome, out of body experiences after
temporo-parietal junction damage.
o Geschwind syndrome = behavioural phenomena evident in individuals with temporal
lobe epilepsy.
o Neurolaw = lie detection.
o Neural redundancy = complex behaviour depends on the function of many brain
areas; some can compensate for others if damaged.
o Neuroplasticity = when brain loss is slow (ageing or slow growing tumour), neural
networks can reorganise themselves to compensate.
o Lay ideas = social representations of science in the general public.
o Phrenology = examining bumps on the head as a measure of personality and mental
ability.
Key Theories:
Localisation hypothesis: it is possible to find areas of the brain that control specific
functions.
Brain overclaim syndrome: overestimating the power and discoveries of
neuroscience findings.
Reverse inference error: one structure can serve several cognitive processes, not all
logical inferences are symmetrical.
Group to group individual inference problem: brain scans in studies often show an
average picture of all participants, not just an individual.
Illusory causation phenomenon: a simplistic tendency to over-attribute causality to a
given stimulus when it is salient (most noticeable) or the focus of attention e.g.
brain, gender, age.
The Mozart effect: the cultural context determines which aspects of science travel to
the public consciousness.
Key Studies/cases:
Franz Gall & Johann Spurzheim and Neil Davie (2012): phrenology/ cranioscopy.
Phineas Gage (1848) and Broca and Wernicke: lesion case studies.
Scoville & Miller (1957): HM case study for neurosurgery.
Schwartz et al (2016), The role of neuroscience within psychology: interdisciplinary
future for psychology, neuroscience to compliment and extend other subfields of
psychology. Need a balance between a focus on neuroscience and other areas of
psychology.
Van Atteveldt et al (2014), Media reporting of neuroscience: articles published
during news waves were less neutral and more optimistic, the topic varied how the
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sianvalentine13. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.