100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Lecture notes Constitutional and Administrative Law (LW1120) £8.89   Add to cart

Lecture notes

Lecture notes Constitutional and Administrative Law (LW1120)

 5 views  0 purchase

Notes for constitutional and administrative law with an example essay on judicial review

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • August 30, 2021
  • 2
  • 2021/2022
  • Lecture notes
  • Peter cumper
  • All classes
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (18)
avatar-seller
reshmabegum
Const. and administrative law lecture 12/11/18

Parl. Sov and EU:

 2016 Brexit referendum-non binding legally; 3mn EU residents not allowed to vote. Parl
given ‘meaningful vote’ on final deal.
 European legal supremacy, UK joined EU but principle made before UK joined; European
Communities Act (1972)
 R v Secretary of State for Transport ex p. Factortame (No.2) ([1991] 1 All E.R)-spanish
fishermen, british parl passed Merchant Shipping Act (1988) restricts fishing rights (act of
parl), prevents foreign nationals from fishing in north sea but contradicts EU law where
article in treaty has a non discrimination provision; cant discriminate between EU members.
Fishing=business in any state. Factortame No.1 (issue about interm relief; avoid bankruptcy
Spanish. Couldn’t grant interm relief to fishing companies, would have to suspend EU law?
HoL highest court at the time but referred to ECJ for clarification, conflict between national
and European law). Was it a breach of European law? ECJ DECIDED IT WAS A VIOLATION
NOT TO GIVE RELIEF. Case came back to UK in Factortame No.2 after ECJ reference where
they said they will give interm relief to Spanish, but had to suspend Merchant Shipping Act.
Pending final decision. Suspend/set aside/disapply. Last time courts suspended Act of
Parl=1688, glorious revolution, 17th century. Dicey-no body has power to override Act of Parl
(second, negative limb) but here it does. HoL justified-doing what parl telling them to do.
Lord Bridge; parl voluntarily entered into limiting parl sov, parl chose to give supremacy to
EU law. Arguing parl is still sovereign. European Communities Act-requires supremacy given
to EU law. ‘temporary restriction’ on parliamentary law making. Parl took us to EU using
their powers.
 Reconciling European Legal Supremacy with Parl. Sov-parl bound its successors to recognise
supremacy of EU law. Revolutionary change (Wade)
 Allan-rejects idea of judicial rev. emphasises British const is evolutionary, changes not
ruptures and breaks. Bent to comply with new reality to encompass with idea that EU law is
supreme.
 Thoburn v Sunderland City Council:
a) ‘Metric Martyrs’-selling imperial measurements. Under Weights and Measures Act
(1985); can sell on metric or in pence/pounds but this Act was amended since EU
director said from now on have to sell in metric. Courts should do what they usually
do when 2 statues are in conflict-should set later statute. Doctrine of implied repeal.
What’s inconsistent with later acts of parl. Europ Communities Act (1972) but
Weights Act comes after. EU immune from implied repeal.
b) Const. Statutes-europ comm act=const statute. HRA, Devolution Acts, Magna Carta,
Bill of Rights ALL CONST STATUTES. CANNOT BE IMPLIEDLY REPEALED, BUT CAN BE
EXPRESSLY REPEALED. Hierarchy in statutes. Const statutes sit above ordinary
statutes. All judges agree with Lord Justices approach. More protection; priority
even if they’re a reflection of later will of parl.
c) Hierarchy of Acts of Parl.
 R (HS2 Action Alliance Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] UKSC 3-procedure made
contrary to European directive. But procedure made by parl dealing with railway.
Principle/Concept of parl privilege. Procedures of parl are not questioned by any body; they
decide these procedures (old rule). Decide case without scrutinising procedure. Doesn’t
follow factortame. Because eu law is supreme, still certain fundamental parl principles that
stand above it?

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller reshmabegum. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £8.89. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£8.89
  • (0)
  Add to cart