100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
Previously searched by you
Summary Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/£4.96
Add to cart
Summary Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/
Full summary of Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The Antecedents, Consequences, and Mediating Role of Organizational Ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 47(2), 209–226.
Antecedents, Consequences and Mediating Role of Organizational
Ambidexterity – Gibson & Birkinshaw (2004)
Components of ambidexterity
1. Alignment (of existing practices)
2. Adaptation (to new circumstances)
The ambidextrous organization achieves both
Value of Ambidexterity
In an organization there is likely conflict between different demands on its task environment
– so trade-offs have to be made.
These trade offs can never be 100% eliminated
However, the most successful organizations manage to reconcile them to a large degree in
order to enhance long-term competitiveness
Structural ambidexterity
Most authors have viewed ambidexterity in structural terms
Basic idea: organizations solve conflicts of interest by establishing “dual structures” –
meaning that some business units focus on alignment whilst others focus on adaptation
Approaches other than “dual structure” to achieve structural ambidexterity:
Task partitioning: one group adopts an organic structure, while another takes on a
mechanistic structure
Temporal separation: the entire unit focuses on one set of tasks first and then on another set
of tasks
Generally, in structural ambidexterity research, the focus is on trade-offs / either-or decisions
From structural to contextual ambidexterity
There has been a shift from trade-off-thinking (either/or) to paradoxical thinking (both/and)
This new form is called contextual ambidexterity – contextual because it arises from the context of
the organization
Also, there is a growing recognition of the role of the processes and systems present in a given
context – they contribute to achieving the desired balance between opposing demands
Contextual ambidexterity
The behavioural capacity to simultaneously demonstrate alignment and adaptability across
an entire business unit
Contextual ambidexterity is best achieved NOT through creating dual structures but by
building a set of processes or systems that enable individuals to make their own judgement
about how to divide their time between conflicting demands for alignment and adaptability
, Alignment = coherence among all the patterns of activities in the business unit; they are working
together towards the same goals
Adaptability = capacity to reconfigure activities in the business unit quickly to meet changing
demands in the task environment
Contextual ambidexterity emerges when leaders of a business unit develop a supportive
organization context
o That is, not through charismatic leadership / a formal org. structure / a strong culture
better performance can be achieved
o Rather, it is achieved through building a carefully selected set of systems and
processes that collectively define a context that allows the meta-capabilities of
alignment and adaptability to simultaneously flourish – and thereby sustain business-
unit performance
Characteristics of Contextual ambidexterity in organizations
Can be seen as a meta-level capacity for alignment and adaptability which permeates all
functions/levels in a unit
Is potentially more sustainable than structural separation of alignment and adaptability
because it facilitates the adaptation of an ENTIRE business unit, jot just the separate units
responsible for new business development
Avoids coordination problems between subunits
Contextual ambidexterity manifests itself in the specific actions of individuals throughout the
organization
In contextually ambidextrous units, the context is flexible and dynamic enough to allow
individuals to make their own judgements on how to divide their time between alignment-
and adaptation-oriented activities
Previous studies support the logic of creating a behavioral orientation toward dual capacities
rather than a higher-level separation of those capacities
Previous studies also imply that organizations must build systems and processes facilitating
these behaviours
Effect of Ambidexterity on Performance
Hypothesis: The higher the level of ambidexterity in a business unit, the higher the level of
performance
The results of the study support this hypothesis
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller fhl. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £4.96. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.