Lecture notes
week 3
- Module
- Criminal Law
- Institution
- University Of Winchester (UoW)
Lecture notes of 3 pages for the course Criminal Law at UoW (mens rea)
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
Mens ReaPurpose;
- Links an individual’s actions to their mindset
- Nothing to do with evil or motive, but about whether the defendant linked their actions to the
consequences (in many cases)
- Mens rea varies per offence, and strict liability offences do not require mens rea – e.g. Driving or being
in charge of a motor vehicle with alcohol concentration above the prescribed limit, contrary to s5 Road
Traffic Act 1988
- However, the offences that we are studying across this course require a mens rea
- Assault Occasioning Actual Bodily Harm: An assault, occasioning actual bodily harm with intention to
carry out an assault or battery OR recklessness to carry out an assault or battery
- Murder: Unlawful killing of a human being under the Queen’s peace with the intention to kill or cause
GBH
- Theft: Dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive
- Criminal Damage: Without lawful excuse, destroys or damages property belonging to another intending
to destroy/damage property or being reckless as to whether the property is damaged/destroyed
Requirements;
- Intention
- Recklessness
- Dishonesty
- Deception
- Knowingly
- Negligently
Intention
What does the word intention mean to you?
The most culpable form of mens rea – the defendant needs to intend that his act produces the prohibited
consequences
This can be broken down into two forms of intent
- Direct intention
Intention is “a decision to bring about, in so far as it lies within the accused’s power, a particular consequence,
no matter whether the accused desired that consequence of his act or not” – Mohan [1976]
In short, direct intent requires the outcome to be the defendant’s aim or purpose.
Desire is irrelevant. Motive is separate from intention. Confirmed in Steane [1947]
Intention can be express or implied
- Indirect or oblique intention
The prohibited behaviour was not necessarily the defendant’s aim and purpose, but was a virtually certain side
effect from the defendant’s action.
The defendant does not need to foresee the consequences as probable – Moloney [1985]
Confirmed in Hancock and Shankland [1986], but became unclear how a judge was to direct a jury.
Nedrick [1986]
Woollin [1999]
Woollin confirmed in Matthews and Alleyne [2003]
Recklessness … an ever changing test
R v Cunningham [1957]
Commissioner of Metropolitan Police v Caldwell [1982]
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller vickyhoney. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £10.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
67232 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now