100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Psychology 16 Marker Revision - Misleading Information EWT £2.99   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Psychology 16 Marker Revision - Misleading Information EWT

 8 views  0 purchase
  • Institution
  • AQA

16 Marker Template including all information about the topic (plus Studies and Evaluation points.)

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

  • January 11, 2022
  • 1
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (456)
avatar-seller
Leahhhh2003
SECTION: Eyewitness Testimony – Misleading Information

TOPIC: Memory

SUMMARY OF KEY IDEAS (K/U)

1. EWT = an account given by a person of an event they have witnessed, used in the criminal justice system to convict.
BUT misidentification in EWT is the greatest cause of incorrect conviction in the USA. EWT can be negatively
influenced by either misleading information or anxiety levels:


MISLEADING INFORMATION: information that can ‘lead’ to a particular response, as opposed to an accurate response.


1. Post Event Discussion
Information shared after the event and collected by a witness can combine different accounts creating false
memories. Source-monitoring error = when an individual is unable to understand where various information
came from so they may incorrectly associate memories with the wrong source.

Research: Gabbert – Participants were in pairs and each shown a video of a crime, each pair was shown a different angle
than the others. Afterwards, they all discussed what they saw. Then the pairs were all asked to recall only what they saw
from their angle… 71% gave information they hadn’t seen but only heard about from others.
This shows how memory can become contaminated, the influence of others is known as memory conformity.



2. Leading Questions
someone can indicate a desired answer/response from the way a question is asked or phrased. Memory can
become easily distorted and inaccurately recalled due reconstruction of memory.

Research: Loftus + Palmer - To test if language used towards eye witnessing in interviews can alter their memory.

Experiment 1 – 45 students (divided into 5 groups) were all showed the same 7 films of a traffic accident. They were all
asked what speed was the car going when it ‘smashed/collided/hit/bumped/contacted’ into each other?
Researchers found the more violent the verb the faster the average speed.
Smashed = 40.5mph (highest) Contacted = 31.8mph (lowest)

Experiment 2 – 150 all shown a 1-minute clip of a traffic incident (crash.) 50 students asked the question using ‘hit’ and 50
were asked using ‘smashed’ and 50 were not asked anything as a control group.
1 week later they were all asked if they saw broken glass on the floor (there wasn’t any.)
Those who were asked with ‘smashed’ recalled broken glass than the control group and the ‘hit’ group.

PEEL STRENGTH PEEL WEAKNESS

Practical Application – M.I. research has lead to the Lack External Validity – participants lack motivation/drive
understanding that EWT cannot always be relied on due to to stick to their account, they may be open to changing
inaccuracy, the criminal justice system have created new their memory as the study has low value to real life.
techniques such and structured and cognitive interviews in Therefore, research may be internally valid but unable to
attempt to improve conviction accuracy. be generalised in other real life settings.

PEEL WEAKNESS In another study 13 witnesses to a real armed robbery
were interviewed again after their initial statement, they
Lacks Mundane Realism – artificial scenarios and videos were asked 2 leading questions – not one witness was
creates lower levels of stress/anxiety arousal. Participants influenced and all original statements were the same.
cannot relate to certain situations and other evidence
shows emotional arousal is key to recall, therefore it This shows in real life accuracy is increased, lab studies
cannot be applied to real life. are too artificial.

PEEL STRENGTH

Lab studies – most research is scientific therefore the cause and effect can be identified, all procedures are
standardised and holds wider reliability through meta - analysis.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller Leahhhh2003. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81113 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart