Summary
Summary Tort Law
- Module
- Tort Law
- Institution
- University Of Law (London)
Summary of 81 pages for the course Tort Law at University of Law (London)
[Show more]
4 reviews
By: Tomisow • 5 year ago
By: badialh419 • 7 year ago
By: nadiakhalifa • 7 year ago
By: Irsa92 • 8 year ago
Content preview
UNIT 1: TRESPASS TO THE PERSON7. THE TORT OF TRESPASS TO THE PERSON
7.1 Introduction
Incorporates three separate torts: assault, battery and false imprisonment (not covered).
7.2 Common Issues
Both assault require intentional conduct - Letang v Cooper [1964]. Trespass to the person is
also ‘actionable per se’, the claimant need not prove any actual harm in order to sue.
7.3 Definition of Assault and Battery
Battery is the intentional direct application of unlawful force to another person. Assault is an
intentional act by the defendant that causes another person to reasonably apprehend the
immediate infliction of a battery upon him.
7.4 Requirements of Battery
● Unlawful force: there is a ‘general exception embracing all physical contact which
is generally acceptable in the conduct of everyday’ - F v West Berkshire Health Authority
[1989].
● Intentional conduct: D need not intend the consequences of his actions. It is
enough that the actions themselves are intentional - Wilson v Pringle [1986].
● Direct application of force: ‘Direct’ means the force must flow almost immediately
and without intervention from the defendant’s actions. It is not necessary that D make
physical contact with C’s body, provided that the medium used is controlled by D.
7.5 Requirements of Assault
● Intentional conduct by D
● Reasonable apprehension by C…
● of an immediate infliction of battery.
It is not necessary for D to intend the C apprehends the infliction of battery.
Assault by words alone
Historically, it was thought that words alone could not amount to an assault - Read v Coker
[1853].
But, in R v Ireland [1998] it was held that they can.
, 7.6 Other Intentionally Caused Harm
Situations where C has acted intentionally but neither assault or battery seem to fit the facts.
If the harm that C has suffered falls outside the recognised existing law then C’s claim will fail
unless he convinces the court to change the existing law, eg. Wilkinson v Downton [1897],
where D’s intentions were liable; this only works if c has suffered some tangible damage as a
result.
The scope of the rule in Wilkinson v Downton was considered by the Lords in Wainwright v
Home Office [2004], which ruled that Wilkinson v Downton did not apply unless the claimants
had suffered a medically recognised condition (rather than stress or upset).
Victims may also use the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 against people who carry out a
course of conduct that amounts to harassment.
7.7 Causation and Remoteness
Although trespass to the person is actionable per se, if C has suffered tangible harm (eg. an
injury) and wishes to recover fully from D, C must prove D’s tort ‘caused’ his loss and that the
loss is not ‘too remote’.
7.8 Defences
Once C has proved that D has committed a trespass to the person, it is for D to justify the action
by making out one of the available defences.
7.8.1 Consent
If C has expressly or impliedly consented to D’s actions, D will not be liable in trespass to the
person.
Chatterton v Gerson [1981] - Consent must be ‘real’, eg. a patient’s consent to medical
treatment will be ‘real’ once the patient has been informed in broad terms of the nature of the
procedure which is intended.
In the case of sport, a competitor consents to all conduct within the rules of the sport, as well as
conduct which may fall outside of the rules, but is nonetheless within its nature - Condon v Basi
[1985].
Chester v Afshar [2004] – a doctor’s failure to disclose risks will not invalidate the patient’s
consent.
Consent is not real if induced by misrepresentation.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gdlnotes. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
52928 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now