Civil Justice System 4 – Alternative Dispute Resolution
Collective description of methods of resolving disputes otherwise than through the normal trial process
o Normal trial process = dispute, pre-action communication, claim iss + served, defence filed
Allocated to a track (depends on value/complexity)
Case management directions made: exchange info: documents, factual/expert evidence
Trial – judgement for Claimant or D
ADR = Parties may negotiate + settle – no civil action
o Pre-action communications – encourage settlement + consideration of ADR
o Pre-action protocols for different types of case
o Follow set pattern – set out case, exchange info, try to settle or narrow the issues
o Court can stay the proceedings after the defence filed, to enable parties to try to settle
o Many cases settle ‘at the door of the court’
Many attempts to introduce rules/schemes to encourage ADR
Problem
o Too early + issues not clear enough + ADR may not work
o Too late + parties’ positions may be entrenched
Civil Procedure Rules encourage ADR
Rule 1.1 – Overriding Objective – Court’s powers inc enc parties to consider ADR + facilitating ADT (Rule 1.4)
Rule 26 – Court managing the case after Defence filed
o Order a ‘stay’ of proceedings so parties can try settle other than by proceeding to trial (Rule 26.4)
o Can refer small claims to meditation (Rule 26.4A)
Costs orders + costs assessment
o Refusal to consider alternatives may mean reduced amounts of costs recovered
Court can’t order parties to engage in ADR but can penalise for failure to consider
Types of ADR
Non-adjudicative helping/enabling parties to settle dispute
o Negotiation – parties/parties’ lawyers
o Mediation – facilitated settlement
o Conciliation – like mediation but more structured + may have a statutory framework
o Early neutral evaluation – expert third party (often a judge) evaluates dispute (or part)
+ gives an opinion on merits – not binding
Adjudicative decision made by neutral 3rd party
o Ombudsman schemes – originated in Scandivinavia
Officials appointed to inv complaints by individuals against public authorities + businesses
Public sector – statutory schemes – examples:
Parliamentary + Health Care Ombudsman – complaints against govt depts + NHS
Prison + Probation Ombudsman inc inv into deaths in prisons/detention centres
Local inc complaints about housing + community care decisions
Commercial/private sector
May be voluntary to be accredited/a member of an Ombudsman/redress scheme
Eg Home Improvements Ombudsman schemes
o Double glazing + conservatory + home insulation + energy systems
Financial Ombudsman
Set up to resolve disputes between financial businesses + their customers
o Inc banking, loans, PPI, insurance, mortgages + investments
o Funded by compulsory contributions by financial institutions
o And, they pay for each investigation
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller jessicaraghwani. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £6.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.