100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary of AQA AS-Level Psychology £5.99
Add to cart

Summary

Summary of AQA AS-Level Psychology

 8 views  0 purchase

Everything you'll need for the AS Psychology exam in a condensed format! Covers: -All key topics- e.g., approaches, behaviour, research methods etc. -Key researchers and studies- as well as the results and what these mean -Key words and definitions for short-mark answers

Preview 3 out of 26  pages

  • March 26, 2022
  • 26
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (15)
avatar-seller
MBlake247
Baron-Cohen et al. 1997

Triad of
imparment


Social Communicatio Imagination
Interaction n (eg. delayed (eg.lack of
(eg. poor language) pretend play)
attachments)




Genes Refrigerator
Chromosone
abnormalities parents


Enviro
MMR vaccine Catalyst
Theories
of autism Cogntive deficit=
Extreme male way brain is wired
brain
•"Theory of mind"




Background

 Carried out previous test on autistic
children
 Sally-Anne test
 Showed children did not have
theory of mind skills
 However didn’t help with more
advanced adult brain

Aim

 Study was to see if high functioning
adults with autism would be
impaired on the theory-of-mind task
called the “Eye task”

, Baron-Cohen et al. 1997
Method  Quasi experiment



Participants (independent Variable)

Group PTTS (Size of group) Mean age Men / women Selection
1 High functioning autistics 28.6 13/3 National autistic society
(16) mag + clinics
2 Normal (50) 30 25/25 Subject panel in uni
(random)
3 Tourettes syndrome (10) 27.77 8/2 London Referral centre


 PPTS TESTED
o In their homes
o Researchers clinic
o Lab at uni
Eye task

 Magazine photos 15X10cm
 Included a foil word = exact opposite of what the emotion was
 Only showed eyes + half of nose
 25 questions asked
 Verified by 8 judges  blind to the hypothesis of the study
 2 possible answers per question (opposites i.e. calm and hyper)
 “Pure” Theory of mind test

Happe’s strange stories

 Used to test imagination
 Used to see if autistics are autistics

Two control tasks  check if performance in eye task was due to other factors

 Gender recognition task  see if issues in eye task where down to face or
social perception instead of Theory of mind
 Basic emotion recognition  sees if issues in eye task where down to
recognising basic emotion expression.


Results

 Eye task = Group 1 did worse than 2 + 3 (Woman did better than men).
 Strange stories= Tourette made no errors unlike autistics
 Gender and emotion task= no differences

Conclusion

 Females did better than males on TOM test

, Baron-Cohen et al. 1997
 High functioning autistics were impaired with TOM even though they
have a high or normal IQ



Evaluation

 Usefulness
o Supports advance test of TOM
o Shows subtle differences in TOM between groups
 Validity
o Lack ecological validity  kept control over variables
 Some PPTS tested in different locations
 Holistic
o Not only looked at autistics and normal but also looked at another
mental condition to compare
 Ethical
o No= put in stressful condition which they knew some autistics
couldn’t answer
 Applications
o Help to understand more mental conditions
o Maybe led to solve it
o How to deal with people who have this condition and know what
they can and can’t do



Key words

Asperger’s syndrome= a mild version of autism

Theory of mind or TOM= an individuals theory about how minds in general
work, including their own and other people.

Sally-Anne test= a simple test involving dolls. Helped to know if a child is autistic.

Order effects = effects such as improvement, boredom or tiredness that occur as
a result of the order in which conditions for task are experimented.

Quasi experiment= an experiment when the independent variable occurs
naturally without the need to manipulate it by the experimenter.

Refrigerator parents= parents who don’t stimulate their children.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller MBlake247. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £5.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

52928 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£5.99
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added