100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Law A-level AQA Tort - PAPER 2 ALL CONTENT £17.49   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Law A-level AQA Tort - PAPER 2 ALL CONTENT

 20 views  0 purchase
  • Institution
  • AQA

This pack includes the basis of content needed for heavier content on tort law a-level topics, with structure (30 markers/10 markers), cases and where to include application from the exam question.

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • June 10, 2022
  • 2
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (9)
avatar-seller
ridat-m
ECONOMIC LOSS - Negligence Misstatement
INTRODUCTION

C may be able to claim for his economic loss under negligence
misstatement.
In order for this claim to succeed, there must be 6 parts that have to be
satisfied. Which include: A special relationship between the parties, a
special skill possessed by the person giving advice and reasonable
reliance on that advice. Caparo v Dickman adds: D must know C will rely
on it and the purpose for which the advice is given is relevant

First, there must be a special relationship between the parties.
This will usually involve one party acting as an expert adviser as in Cornish
v Midland Bank.
A social relationship is unlikely to suffice.
C and D do / don’t have a special relationship as ______ (apply and
evaluate)
This is supported in the case of Chaudry v Prabhakar, where the C’s
friend gave advice to buy a car but was totally unroadworthy.
The claimant was able to successfully sue under negligent misstatement
as although C and D were social friends, D had knowledge about his
speciality and provided a relationship between the parties.

Next, there must be a special skill possessed by the person giving advice
Liability will only usually arise if the advice given is in the area of expertise
of the person giving it as in Mutual Life and Citizens assurance Co v Evatt.
_______ did / didn’t have expertise as _______ (apply - you can propose
this hypothetically)

Thirdly, there must be a reasonable reliance on that advice.
This can be thought of as a control measure as in Law Society v KPMG
Peat.
The expert’s advice must be one that the claimant would rely on as in
Smith v Bush.
There was / wasn’t reasonable reliance on the advice given by D

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller ridat-m. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £17.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

81989 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£17.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart