100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Metaphysics of mind-religious language £5.49   Add to cart

Lecture notes

Metaphysics of mind-religious language

 6 views  0 purchase

This features extended notes on all of the topic of religious language in regards to the metaphysics of mind topic in philosophy, includes arguments and answers to arguments from numerous philosophers as well.

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • June 10, 2022
  • 6
  • 2021/2022
  • Lecture notes
  • Ali
  • All classes
All documents for this subject (2)
avatar-seller
vovan2004
Religious language part 1




KEY PHILOSOPHERS:Hick and Ayer

-Communicating about religious matters can be tricky because it may not always be clear what
people mean by religious statements. E.g.:
◦ People disagree about what God’s attributes are
◦ People disagree about what particular attributes mean (does omnipotence mean the ability to do
the logically impossible?)

Cognitivism and non-cognitivism

-Cognitivism: Propositions must have a truth-value in order to be meaningful.
-Non-cognitivism: Statements can still be meaningful without having a truth-value.

-Cognitivists maintain that when people make religious statements such as “Jesus is risen” or “God
lives in all of us” they are simply articulating their beliefs; religious claims generally do not have
truth-value.
-A truth-value means that the statement is either true or false (it doesn’t matter which).
◦ Statements such as “a bike has two wheels” and “a bike has two thousand wheels” both have
truth-value (one is true; the other is false)
◦ On the other hand, “cheese is delicious” and “God walks beside me” are not the sorts of
statements that can be true or false.

Verification




-Verificationism is a COGNITIVIST approach to religious language.

-Verificationists suggest that religious statements are not meaningful because they are not
VERIFIABLE (they cannot be proven true).

-This is an EMPIRICIST approach because it relies on the possibility of physical proof.

, Logical positivism
-Logical positivism is a theory which maintains that if language is to be meaningful, it must stick to
discussing things which could (theoretically) be proven true.

-Once people start discussing metaphysical concepts which go beyond human experience (such as
souls, God, Heaven) it is problematic.

-Ayer is a logical positivist who proposes the VERIFICATION PRINCIPLE which states that: A
proposition is meaningful if and only if it is either (a) or (b):
(a) ANALYTIC
(b) VERIFIABLE IN PRINCIPLE
If it is neither (a) nor (b) then it is factually meaningless

-Saying that something is verifiable in principle means that we know what empirical evidence it
would take to prove the statement true.

-It doesn’t matter that this check couldn’t actually take place; all that matters is that the statement
could, in principle, be checked and proven true.

-Whenever logical positivists discuss verifiability, they are referring to verifiability in principle.

Religious languages is not verifiable
-Ayer and the Vienna Circle argue that religious statements are meaningless because they are not
analytic, and they are not verifiable even in principle.

-Statements such as ‘God exists’, ‘souls reside in Heaven’ or ‘God is the Father, the Son and the Holy
Ghost’ are not verifiable because they go beyond the sphere of human experience.

-we don’t know what evidence it would take to prove them, nor how (even in principle) they could
be verified. Therefore they are factually meaningless.

Eschatological verification




-Eschatological verification is a response to the COGNITIVISTS’ claim that religious statements are
not meaningful because they are not verifiable.

-Hick agrees with Ayer and other logical positivists that only verifiable (factually significant)
statements are meaningful.

-However, Hick argues that religious statements are meaningful because they are indeed verifiable.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller vovan2004. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £5.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

60281 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£5.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart