Essay
Model essay research into cultural variations of attachment
- Module
- Attachment
- Institution
- AQA
16/16 essay describing van Ijzendoorn's study, analysing cultural variations of attachment
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
Describe and evaluate research into cultural variations in attachment. 16 marksVan Ijzendoorn and Kroonenberg’s meta-analysis (1988) of 32 strange situation studies across 8
different countries wanted to asses if attachment was universal or culturally bound. The meta
analysis included studies from 8 different countries, with a mixture of individualistic (e.g USA) and
collectivist cultures (e.g. Japan). Overall, they found a similar spread of attachment types as
Ainsworth’s original study, (67% secure, 21% insecure avoidant, 12% insecure resistant). Secure
attachment was most common for all countries, suggesting that it is in fact the most healthy
attachment type. However, this percentage varied, ranging from 75% in the UK (individualistic) to
50% in China (collectivist at the time). Collectivist countries(Japan and Israel) also had higher
proportions of insecure resistant attachments (29% in Israel compared to 3% in the UK) and lower
insecure avoidant attachments- Germany had the highest. However most interestingly the greatest
variation was found within one country rather than between (1.5x greater), with one US study
having 90% secure attachment and another with 46%. Overall, the meta analysis does suggest
attachment is universal, and supports Bowlby’s idea that attachment is innate and universal.
Unfortunately, despite its aim to uncover cultural variations, Van Ijzendoorn’s study had a biased
sample. It’s large sample of almost 2000 under 2 year olds and their mothers, while increasing the
generalisability in one sense, is over representative of individualistic cultures, with 27 of the 32
studies from individualistic countries (and 18 of these from the US alone) and only 5 from collectivist
countries ( comparatively only 1 from China). This large bias means that the collectivist samples are
likely to be less representative, and therefore lower the population validity, a large flaw in this study.
Furthermore, the imposed etic of using a US based procedure to test other countries means that the
data is not always represented appropriately. Mary Ainsworth’s Strange situation was created in the
US based on the US’s western norms and values of childhood. Using this to label children of other
cultures, and indeed say they are the ‘wrong’ attachment type, is highly flawed. For example, in
Germany, a country which values independence, the highest rate on insecure-avoidant attachment
was recorded- but this doesn’t mean that they have less good attachments, they just value different
traits. Unfortunately, the cross-cultural validity for this study is also low.
Finally, it has been argued that Van Ijzendoorn was testing countries not cultures . He compared
results from major countries but failed to realise that most countries have many different cultures
and subcultures within them. Researchers in Japan have found that while attachments in Urban
Tokyo have had very similar proportions to that of the US, in more rural areas they found higher
insecure-resistance, because of the 2 very different cultures. Van Ijzendoorn has failed in measuring
what he intended to, which can be seen in the fact variations within countries were larger than
between them, because of the different subcultures within them. We must exercise caution in
assuming an individual sample is representative of a particular culture- it is safe to say that Van
Ijzendoorn has lost significant validity in his study.
5
Temperament hypothesis
Lagan criticised Dd
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sarajnb11. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £5.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
76799 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now