100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Causation and Sentencing model essay £4.49   Add to cart

Essay

Causation and Sentencing model essay

 1 view  0 purchase

A model, 10 mark, A grade essay assessing a problem question for causation and sentencing

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

  • June 27, 2022
  • 1
  • 2021/2022
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
All documents for this subject (102)
avatar-seller
bethemmahook
In this case, Chris may not satisfy the legal causation of murder due to “Novus Actus Interveniens” or a new cause
intervening. This theory states that if a new act intervenes, the chain of causation will be broken and the defendant
will not be guilty. However, this does not work if the defendant is the operative cause of death or, in other words,
was the actual cause of death. In this case, the first cause would be Candy giving the child ketamine and the second
cause would be Chris kidnapping the child. Whilst Chris kidnapping the child may be a new act intervening, it does
not break the chain of causation as Candy giving the child ketamine was the operative cause of death not Chris’
actions. This is similar to “R v Smith” where, despite a new act intervening when the medical officer refused to treat
the victim, Smith was still the operative cause of death as he was the one who shot the victim. In both R v Smith and
Chris’ case, the new act did not break the chain so therefore Chris is not guilty of murder.

If Candy were charged with manslaughter, she would likely be sentenced to 10 years imprisonment. There are two
key aggravating factors that would increase her sentence. First of all, as the victim was a child, there is a vulnerable
victim, especially considering that the child is a baby. Moreover, as Candy is the child’ mother, there is an abuse of
power and trust because the child would trust Candy to look after them yet Candy abused this trust. However, a big
mitigating factor is that Candy is only 18 so is an adolescent. Therefore, her sentence would drop a significant
amount but the aggravating factors would still keep the sentence fairly high.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller bethemmahook. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £4.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79223 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£4.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart