100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary MELS - Legal Reasoning £2.99   Add to cart

Summary

Summary MELS - Legal Reasoning

 1 view  0 purchase

Summary notes on legal reasoning including the orthodox view and its critiques and judicial decision making

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • July 5, 2022
  • 3
  • 2018/2019
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (9)
avatar-seller
anoukageene
Week 7 – Thinking Critically about Legal Reasoning


Orthodox view

- What is the law?
o A set of rules which govern society and create structure of authority or
government to run social order
o Independent and distinct enterprise from the other forms of social control
 Griffith argues that an “impartial and neutral judiciary” is a myth
 Lord Devlin sees this as a view of the left and argues “so
what?”
o Peter Goodrich view of the law
- The decision-making process – David Kairys’s views
o The law pre-exists, is predictable and available to anyone with reasonable
legal skills
o Facts of a case are ascertained by objective hearing and evidentiary rules
means the truth is revealed
o Result of a case is determined by a routine application of the law to the facts
o Any reasonably competent and fair judge will reach the “correct” decision
o Some recognition that law has something to do with social values --> policy
considerations

Critics of the Orthodox view
- (American) legal realism
o Christopher Columbus Langdell saw the law as science
 Jerome Frank criticized this view as “the basic legal myth”
 Indeed, law is inseparable from politics and ethics
 Always two sides to any legal problem – no one solution
- Critical legal studies
o Law is contradictory and inconsistent --> indeterminacy
 Not random though

Judicial Decision-Making

- The Supreme Court lacks diversity which is problematic because of:
o Democratic legitimacy, Equality and Representation
 White Oxbridge educated men are not representative of UK
population
 Makes representation of different view points more difficult
 Affects judicial decision making
 Lady Hale - ‘A generally more diverse bench, with a wider range of
backgrounds, experience and perspectives on life, may well be
expected to bring about some collective change in empathy and
understanding of the diverse backgrounds, experiences and
perspectives of those whose cases come to them.’


1

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller anoukageene. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

77254 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart