Property offences are over half of all crime recorded by the police, (e.g., theft and fraud).
Theft is a statutory offence found under the Theft Act 1968, s.1(1) - was previously found under Larceny
Act 1916 - theft has expanded greatly since its involvement in the Larceny Act.
- Under the old law, it was only theft where D took physical property from V.
- The new law extends to intangible property.
Section1(1) Theft Act 1968 - “A person is guilty of theft if he dishonestly appropriates property belonging
to another with the intention of permanently depriving the other of it”.
- Actus reus - appropriation, property, belonging to another
- Mens rea - dishonestly, intention of permanently deprive
Appropriation -
Theft Act 1968 s.3(1): “Any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner, amounts to an
appropriation”.
There were debates both in courts and Parliament about what constituted appropriation.
Three Key Questions -
1. Does D have to assume one or all the rights of the owner in order to appropriate?
2. Does D ‘assume’ a right of the owner, for the purposes of s.3(1), when he has the owner’s
consent to act as he does in relation to the property?
3. If D receives the property as a valid gift at civil law, can be nevertheless appropriate the property
for the purposes of s.3(1)?
1. Assuming any of the rights of an owner -
Ownership rights = bundle of rights
R v Morris (1984) AC 320 (swapping price labels in a store and consequently paid a lower price) confirmed
in R v Gomez (1993) AC 442
Appropriation can occur more than once in relation to the same property, but theft is committed just
once and only continues while D is ‘on the job’ - R v Atakpu (1994) QB 69 (CA).
Meaning that appropriation can happen multiple times; theft cannot.
e.g., if a friend decides to borrow your laptop - appropriation happens when they touch
the laptop, when they turn it on and when they decide to keep it.
2. Appropriation with the owner’s consent -
Consent is irrelevant, appropriation is still appropriation - Lawrence v Metropolitan Police Commissioner
(1972) AC 676 (involved an Italian student who did not speak very good English, the taxi driver said that
the fare would be very expensive when it was meant to be 50p and D argued that it was not theft as V
had consented to him taking it, this appeal was denied)
Lord Roskill in Morris: appropriation requires an adverse interference with the owner’s rights.
Morris was overturned by R v Gomez, which is the current law.
R v Gomez (1993) AC 442 Summary - (concerned stolen cheques, contended on appeal that as his
management has authorised them it did not amount to theft, this was dismissed).
D needs only assume one of the rights of the owner, not all of them.
An appropriation is an ‘objective description of the act done irrespective of the mental state of
either the owner or the accused’ - the owner’s consent is irrelevant.
3. Valid gift -
R v Hinks (2001) 2 AC 24 (young mother befriended a naive 50-year-old man and regularly accompanied
him to the bank to withdraw money over a period of time and gave it to her, this amounted to £16,000
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller laceybright. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £6.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.