100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
DOES GLOBAL HISTORY HAVE TO BE COMPARATIVE £7.48
Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. Oxford University (OX)
  4.  
  5. History

Essay

DOES GLOBAL HISTORY HAVE TO BE COMPARATIVE
 0 purchase

This essay will assess the extent to which global history must be comparative by examining a working definition of ‘global history’, by assessing globalisation’s impact upon the perceived nature of time and space, and global history’s relationship with national histories. Most historians co...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 5  pages

Document information

  • July 17, 2022
  • 5
  • 2021/2022
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (40)

Seller

avatar-seller
hasa

Reviews received

Content preview

1. To what extent does global history have to be comparative?



This essay will assess the extent to which global history must be comparative by examining a working
definition of ‘global history’, by assessing globalisation’s impact upon the perceived nature of time
and space, and global history’s relationship with national histories. Most historians concur that
global history is a new ‘perspective’ with which to examine the past, and this method gained
popularity from the 1980’s.1 It seems that comparison is a fundamental tool of examination for
global history. However, it is imperative that global historians balance their comparisons with
analyses of similarities, interactions and connections, to gain a holistic understanding of global
history.

It is requisite to provide a working definition of what the term ‘global history’ entails, to establish the
value of comparison in global history. ‘Global history’ is an attempt by historians, living in a new
global epoch, to trace back the factors that created this epoch. This is often achieved by examining
case studies on a local, national or international scale, and assessing their comparisons, similarities
and tracing interactions and connections. Global history aims to nurture a better understanding of
the factors that brought about globalisation.

There is debate regarding the extent to which we are living in a new global epoch. However, the key
global historical work argues that we are living in a new global epoch and noted this is suggested by
relatively recent changes in human history. Changes include a greater idea of living on one planet
due to the world viewed from space, environmental changes that affect the whole globe and
multinational corporations.2 These factors, and others such as the development of cables and the
telephone, coalesced to form the process of globalisation. The histories of each factor’s
development differ vastly, regarding location across the globe and context. In this way, it is useful to
compare facets within factors, such as speed differences between regions in constructing satellites,
to identify the motors of historical change. However, this is only useful when drawing similarities
within and between factors and identifying interactions that also drove the processes. When
amalgamated in this way, one may draw a more balanced viewpoint regarding the importance of
factors pushing and pulling in the dance of globalisation.

It is reasonable to argue that the culmination of globalising processes has considerably densified
time and space. The Industrial Revolution’s development of steam engines reduced travel time. The
19th century’s laying of the first transatlantic cable, building of the Suez Canal and the telephone’s
invention, and other later developments such as satellites, make communication across vast
distances almost instantaneous. These developments have individual rich histories, and comparison
between these different case studies across time is useful for tracking the mobilisation and
development of civilisations. Hopkins favoured this view. He argued that a comparison of trans-
societal movements of products, people and ideas is requisite for understanding the global impact of
mobilisation.3 Comparison can enlighten the historian in this manner; comparison here it useful for
tracking the movements of products and ideas from one area to another, and for explaining the
modifications of revived ideas. However, more recent historians such as Geoff Eley convincingly

1
J. Laurence Hare and Jack Wells, ‘Promising the World: Surveys, Curricula, and the Challenge of Global
History’, History Teacher, 48, no. 1 (2015), pp. 371-88.
2
Bruce Mazlish, ‘An Introduction to Global History,’ in Ralph Buultjens (ed.), Conceptualizing Global History,
(Boulder: Westview Press, 1993), pp. 1- 47.
3
A. G. Hopkins, ‘The Historiography of Globalisation and the Globalisation of Regionalism’, Journal of the
Economic and Social History of the Orient, 53, no. ½ (2010), pp. 19- 36.

, maintained the argument for also exploring societal similarities during globalisation. 4 He argued this
in conjuncture with utilising comparison and assessing interactions as historical tools, is greatly
valuable in gaining a more accurate understanding of the globe. Comparison as one tool balanced
against others de-centralises Europe as the main actor on the historical stage for globalisation
because historians may trace important developments that occurred across the globe as necessary.
Thus, global history as utilising comparison checked against the tools of similarity and assessing
interactions, cultivates a more balanced judgement as comparison alone could overstate the
importance of certain factors and understate or overlook the role of other factors.

Comparisons of national histories can be informative. However, understanding the history of
globalisation well calls for marrying comparisons with similarities, and assessing general global
trends and contexts. Drawing a similarity between each nations’ political tensions, and the global
context of the Cold War denotes the context of the Soviet and American national histories when
studying their satellite development. This creates a systematic method for analysis and generates a
more complete view of these nations’ histories which imposed the communication revolution upon
the globe.

In conclusion, global history is fundamentally comparative because this allows historians to note and
trace changes or developments. However, global history balances comparison equally against other
important historical tools. Assessing similarities in global history allows historians to trace long term
developments over time. Assessing interactions allows historians to connect developments between
societies around the globe and enables historians to find the sources for developments in regions
around the globe. Global history discusses global processes that have fundamentally altered our
behaviour and attitudes, such as through personal communication and international communication.
Global historians currently debate views regarding a developing global identity, where people feel
connected on a global scale, due to communication advance. Due to time and space constraints, this
essay has not examined differences between the importance of comparison on a local, national and
international scale. The debate would be greatly aided by this, as it is possible the importance of
comparison as a tool in global history may alter between the scales of enquiry.




4
Geoff Eley, ‘Historicizing the Global, Politicizing Capital: Giving the Present a Name’, History Workshop
Journal, 63, no. 1, pp. 154- 188.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller hasa. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £7.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

64670 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 15 years now

Start selling

Recently viewed by you

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

BIOL 201 UNIT EXAM 1 Questions and Answers

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

NR 631 DELIVERABLES AND CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS

Exam (elaborations) ·

(2)

ATI MENTAL HEALTH PROCTORED FINAL EXIT EXAM 2021

Essay ·

(0)

Marxist Geography and the Capitalist System

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

Oxyfuel cutting test questions and answers

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

NURSING NUR 2349 PN1 Exam 3 Study Guide For 2022

Summary ·

(0)

Samenvatting Strategy voor Pre-Master (2022)

Other ·

(0)

VSIM for Nursing Mona Hernandez; Completed.

Exam (elaborations) ·

(0)

SDENG3J Assignment 2 2024 - DUE 19 July 2024
£7.48
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added