Summary document of the key studies in memory and attachment in Psychology. Covers dates, psychologists, aims, procedures, findings, conclusions and evaluations.
AIMS:
● To investigate how leading questions affect eyewitness testimony
PROCEDURE:
● Lab Study
● Sample of 45 participants
● Split into 5 conditions
● Watched a video and asked “how fast were the cars going when they hit each other?”
● Only thing that changed was the verb
● Split into smashed, hit, collided, contacted and bumped
FINDINGS:
● The harsher the verb, the faster participants perceived the car to go
● Contacted mean= 31.8mph
● Smashed mean= 40.5mph
CONCLUSIONS:
● The leading question affected eye-witness testimony
● Leading questions bias memory recall
POSITIVE EVALUATIONS:
● Real-world applications- important in the criminal justice system
NEGATIVE EVALUATIONS:
● Lab study- lack of ecological validity
● Responses in lab studies are less likely to be accurate as the answers don’t matter,
unlike in the criminal justice system
, POST EVENT DISCUSSION IN EYE WITNESS TESTIMONIES
GABBERT ET AL (2003)
AIMS:
● Investigating the effect of post-event discussion on eyewitness testimony
PROCEDURE:
● Lab study
● Participants in pairs watched a video of a crime but from different perspectives
● After the video participants discussed what they saw with their partner
● Each given an individual test after the discussion to see what they could remember
● 2 conditions- post event discussion and no post event discussion
FINDINGS;
● 71% of participants mistakenly recalled aspects of the event they could not see
● In the control group 0% of participants said things they couldn’t have seen
● Evidence of memory conformity and memory contamination
CONCLUSIONS:
● Post-event discussion reduces the accuracy of eyewitness testimony
● Witnesses often go along with each other to either win social approval or because
they believe the other witnesses are right and they are wrong
POSITIVE EVALUATIONS:
● Real-world applications
NEGATIVE EVALUATIONS:
● Lab study- lack of ecological validity
● Demand characteristics- participants are in an artificial environment
● Evidence challenging memory conformity- Elin Skagerberg and Daniel Wright (2008)
- participants came to the conclusion that a woman had “medium brown” hair rather
than dark or light brown- suggests that memory is distorted through contamination by
misleading post event discussion rather than the result of memory conformity
● Eyewitness testimony is more accurate for some aspects of an event than for others
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller meganbarker. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
