Summary
Summary Social Conformity (Sec 1)
- Module
- Psych A Level
- Institution
- Psych A Level
The first section of AS / A-Level Psychology.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
SOCIAL CONFORMITYTypes of Conformity
Internalisation - going along with the majority and believing their views as their own.
- a.k.a ‘informational social influence’
- often occurs in unfamiliar surroundings.
Compliance - go with the majority, though you don’t share the same views.
- done to appear normal
- a.k.a ‘normative social influence’
Identification - doing what’s expected of you.
- fulfilling a social role / imitating a role model.
- changing own behaviour to fit in a specific role in society.
Sherif (1935) - Conformity and the Autokinetic Effect ..
- When alone, participants came to their own conclusions and estimates (personal norms). These
results were widely varied between the participants.
- Groups were retested together, where estimates tended to converge and become more alive.
- Once retested a third time alone, their guesses were more like the group estimates than their own.
Asch (1951) - Conformity on an Ambiguous Task ..
- In control groups, participants gave the wrong answer 0.7% of the time.
- Critical trials, however, participants conformed to the majority (with a wrong answer) 37% of the
time. 75% of people conformed at least once.
- Some participants revealed that they didn’t believe their answers after the trial, claiming they just
didn’t want to look different.
Situational Factors
1. Group size
2. Unamity / social support
3. Task difficulty
4. Confidence and expertise
5. Gender (?)
Zimbardo (1973) - Stanford Prison Experiment ..
- Guards would assert authority (initially) and prisoners resisted by sticking together.
- Prisoners progressively became more passive and obedient, while guards invented harsher /
nastier punishments.
- The experiment was abandoned early as some prisoners became very distressed.
* The participants were male students recruited for both parts of the prison (guards versus prisoners).
Orlando (1973) .
- Mock psychiatric ward in a hospital for 3 days, 29 of the hospital staff volunteered to be patients
while a further 22 staff were asked to carry out their usual daily roles.
- It soon became difficult to tell apart the participants versus the real participants. They had
conformed to their roles, 6 of which had attempted to escape the ward.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller chloechainey. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £4.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
64438 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now