100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Education Topic 6 - Educational policy £7.99   Add to cart

Other

Education Topic 6 - Educational policy

 2 views  0 purchase

These notes are formatted into a Cornell Notes style. In this document, different educational policies are outlined and explained in relation to how they reduce or reproduce inequality.

Preview 2 out of 14  pages

  • August 3, 2022
  • 14
  • 2020/2021
  • Other
  • Unknown
All documents for this subject (391)
avatar-seller
harleyy
2. Education

Topic 6 – Educational policy and inequality

Educational policy and inequality

Educational policy Refers to the plans and strategies for education introduced
by government
Eg. Academies Act (2010)

Academies Act (2010) This educational policy made it possible for all state schools
to become academies

Responses Most educational policies come about as a response to
these issues:
- Equal opportunities
- Selection and choice
- Control of education
- Marketisation and privatisation

Educational policy in Britain before
1988

Pre-industrial revolution There were no state schools – education was only available
for the privileged minority, or by the churches/charities for
the poor

Industrialisation Increased the need for a skilled workforce, causing the state
to become more involved in education
Reflecting this growing importance, the state made
schooling compulsory for children aged 5-13 in 1880
The type of education children received was based on their
class background so did little to change their ascribed status
Middle-classes were given an academic curriculum which
equipped them for professional careers whereas working-
classes were prepared with basic skills and instilled with an
obedient attitude to superiors

Selection: the tripartite system

1944 Education began to be influenced by the idea of meritocracy

Introduced the tripartite system, whereby children could be
Education (Butler) Act (1944) sorted into different types of schools based on their
aptitudes and abilities – these were identified using an 11+
exam
The 3 types of school were:
- Grammar schools
- Secondary modern schools
- Technical schools
The 3rd type was much more uncommon, so it was more of a
bipartite system than a tripartite system

, Rather than promoting meritocracy, the tripartite system,
Reproducing class inequality and by extension the 11+, actually reproduced class
inequality by channelling the 2 social classes into 2 different
types of school that offered unequal opportunities

The system also reproduced gender inequality by requiring
Reproducing gender inequality girls to obtain a higher mark than boys to obtain a place at a
grammar school

The tripartite system also legitimating inequality through
Legitimating inequality the ideology that ability is inborn
Thus, it was argued that ability could be measured earlier on
in life, through the 11+
In reality, children’s environments greatly affect their
chances at school

The comprehensive school system

1965 The comprehensive school system was introduced

The comprehensive school system It aimed to overcome the class divide of the tripartite
system and make education more meritocratic
The 11+ was to be abolished and the tripartite system was
to be replaced widescale with comprehensive schools
However, it was left to local authorities to decide whether
these school wanted to become comprehensive – and not
all did so
As a result, the grammar-secondary modern divide still
exists

Two theories of the role of
comprehensives

Functionalists Argue that comprehensives promote social integration by
bringing children of different social classes together in one
school environment
Also see the comprehensive system as more meritocratic
because it gives pupils a longer period to develop and show
their abilities, unlike the tripartite system which sought to
filter out ability at an earlier stage

Fond (1969) Found little social mixing between working-class and
middle-class pupils, largely because of streaming

Marxists Argue that comprehensives are not meritocratic
Rather, they reproduce class inequality generationally
through their practices of streaming and labelling which
deny working-class children equal opportunity

Marketisation

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller harleyy. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

82956 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£7.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart