Summary
Summary Baker & Hacker - Rules notes
- Module
- Wittgenstein
- Institution
- Oxford University (OX)
Notes from Baker and Hacker's 'Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar and Necessity'
[Show more]
Content preview
Simon Blackburn - The Individual Strikes Back● Introduction: is Kripke’s exegesis of Wittgenstein correct? What is the significance of
the thesis, irrespective of this?
○ Wittgenstein’s scepticism is not designed to promote a conclusion about
knowledge/certainty, but to force a reconsideration of the metaphysics of the issue
● There are two parts to Wittgenstein’s argument: attacking the old conception and
producing a replacement
○ if successful, his positive part will produce a conception on which public
rule following is possible, whereas private rule-following is not
Sceptical Solutions
● Long ground laying section that I don’t understand
The Critique of Rule-Following
● We are chasing a normative judgement - that something is correct or incorrect
○ this fact is difficult to find, and its normative nature is the problem
● Exposition of Kripke
○ this argument corresponds to the negative point in Wittgenstein, that we
get no nearer to the fact we are looking for by embarking on a potential regress of
interpretations
■ the positive point, that the fact is exhibited in obeying a
rule, must wait
● Kripke rejects a dispositional account of rule following, partly because he claims
dispositions are finite
○ this is not clear - perhaps we offer the answer we would give by
reiterating procedures we are disposed to use
● We may imagine two machines, one that is ‘supposed’ to compute addition, but because it
is faulty computes a bent function, and another that is designed to compute the bent function
○ the two may be identical - this suggests that the notion of the rule must
be external
The Community and the Individual
● The individual has a hard time against Kripke’s sceptic
○ he can’t make the sceptic appreciate what kind of fact it was that showed
he was being faithful to a principle, following a rule or previous intention
■ so the sceptic claims that there is no fact as to whether
the bent rule or the natural rule was intended, and given this, there is no fact of
the matter that any principle at all was in force
○ the individual can turn to the community, and claim that his inculcation
in a public practice proves his rule-following
■ but why shouldn’t the public ‘rule’ be subject to the
same bent/natural problem?
■ the community supposedly has justification conditions
for seeing or dignifying someone as a rule follower - that his practice must
accord with the community practice
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller patrickfleming. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now