Stanley Cavell - Notes and afterthoughts on the opening of Wittgenstein’s Investigations
● Why does Wittgenstein open with the quote from Augustine?
○ it seems unremarkable/inoffensive as a philosophical theory
■ hence the very fact that W pauses over it suggests
something - if Augustine’s picture is wrong, then what is immune to
philosophical question?
● We might think that W’s beef rests on the suggestion that Augustine’s picture is either:
○ incomplete, though fine as far as it goes
■ but it isn’t even applicable to names and nouns. it
contains empty assumptions about teaching, learning, pointing, naming etc which
give the illusion of providing explanations
○ a faulty generalization
■ no. Augustine can’t defend himself against this charge
without totally undermining the validity of his picture as a picture of all language
● But for W, Augustine’s picture isn’t just inappropriate
○ it is appropriate to ‘a system of communication, but not everything we
call language is this system’
● Wittgenstein sees the picture as:
○ containing a particular idea of language
○ natural in the act of philosophizing
■ this is curious - if W sees philosophy as demonstrating
the obvious (‘perspicuous’), then why is Augustine’s picture natural (and
wrong)?
● W gives the example of the builders as a language build on the foundations of the
Augustinian picture
○ this language, which is consistent with foundations in pointing, cannot
handle something as complex as a colour - for how do we point to a colour?
○ W suggests that if language were acquired and used as Augustine’s
description suggests, then it would be something other than we think it or know it to be
○ the idea behind the builders’ language as complete is that they only use
their words when they are in that situation, doing that work (language-game)
● Why are we reluctant to call it a language?
○ too few words? what is our measure?
■ we say that a child speaks when she has only four words
● (but here the child is part of a much
bigger language game)
○ do they seem too mechanical?
■ does it matter whether they understand the words?
● here the behaviourist/non-behaviourist
debate comes in
○ the non-behaviourist
must show in virtue of what the builders understand the
commands
○ but the real question is
of the circumstances in which we say that someone understands
(grammar)
■ (and
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller patrickfleming. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.