● There is a difference between irrationality and non-rationality/lesser rationality
○ irrationality refers to logical inconsistency or contradiction
○ when we denigrate the belief systems of other cultures we are probably
accusing them of being less rational than ours, rather than irrational
■ such a judgement relies on some standards of rationality
that apply across cultures
● The crucial difference between our culture and that of e.g. the Zande is that we have
theoretical understanding
○ this requires a disengaged perspective - a concern with things as they are,
rather than simply as they affect us
■ this accounts for a vast difference in what we think and
say
○ a theoretical understanding seeks to articulate, to lay out the features of
the issue in perspicuous order
■ this perspicuous order is necessarily disengaged and thus
related to rationality
○ members of theoretical cultures find this view plausible, and tend to
judge the beliefs of atheoretical cultures less rational
■ this is distinct from accusing them of contradiction or
inconsistency, which would constitute irrationality
○ Winch claims that it is wrong to judge an atheoretical culture by the
standards of a theoretical one
■ we shouldn’t judge the Zande by its success in gaining
control over nature (technology) because this may not be one of their standards
of rationality
● Winch argues that we may be missing the point of certain rituals in interpreting them
according to the standards of science
○ maybe rather than seeking to control their environment, they are merely
expressing an attitude towards contingencies
■ whilst it is plausible that they are doing so, it seems
unlikely that they are not also attempting to control some of those contingencies
○ to claim that the standards are completely different is still ethnocentric
■ it means we can judge the contrast in terms that make no
sense to the other culture
● Modern science was facilitated by the breaking of the connection between understanding
of the world and attunement with the world
○ whereas pre-Galilean science saw understanding as a logical corollary of
attunement with the natural world, modern science jettisoned these notions of meaning
and significance as obstructing illusions
○ but there are still problems in applying this distinction to other societies
■ raises the question of whether this distinction has any
sense for them
○ the two approaches to science are incommensurable; they occupy the
same space but cannot both be carried on at the same time
● Similarly scientific and primitive cultural beliefs are incommensurable
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller patrickfleming. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.