100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
PVL3703 FINAL EXAM PACK 2020 £2.99   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

PVL3703 FINAL EXAM PACK 2020

 1 view  0 purchase

PVL3703 FINAL EXAM PACK 2020

Preview 4 out of 45  pages

  • October 2, 2022
  • 45
  • 2022/2023
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers
All documents for this subject (2)
avatar-seller
biriamoraa07
EXAMINATION PACK
LAW OF DELICT
PVL3703
SOLUTIONS FOR PAST EXAM PAPERS




PVL3703 www.tutorialscampus.co.za +27 (71) 224 5255



1|Page

, TABLE OF CONTENTS



Q: PAPER(S)



OCT/NOV 2019


MAY/JUNE 2019


OCT/NOV 2018


MAY/JUNE 2018


OCT/NOV 2017


MAY/JUNE 2017


OCT/NOV 2016
PVL3703 –LAW OF DELICT

2019 OCTOBER/NOVEMBER

1. 2
2. 3

2|Page

, 3. 2
4. 2..
5. 2
6. 4
7. 4
8. 3
9. 3
10. 4
11. 1
12. 3
13. 1
14. 3
15. 4
16. 3
17. 2
18. 4
19. 2
20. 1




QUESTION 1

THIS QUESTION DEALS WITH AN ACT/CONDUCT:

Conduct


3|Page

, Is a voluntary human act or omission

Elements

1. Human: where an animal is used as an instrument a human act is still present. A
juristic person can act through its agents (company) and be held delictually liable
for its actions.

2. Voluntary conduct: the act must have been performed voluntarily – the
wrongdoer must have had control over his muscular movements (i.e. if it is
susceptible to control the will of the person involved).

3. Commission or Ommission

Defence of Automatism:

The voluntary conduct on the part of the defendant is a requirement for delictual
liability. The defendant could argue that the conduct complained of doesn’t satisfy
the requirements of voluntariness.


This is where someone acted mechanically = sleep, unconscious, fainting fit,
absolute force, epileptic fit, serious intoxication, black out. If these are present a
person is incapable of controlling his bodily movement = purely mechanical
action and that person raises the defence of automatism.


In the Mkize case: X stabbed and killed Y with a knife while X was having an
epileptic fit, he was acquitted of murder.

Antecedent liability:

The defendant may not successfully rely on the defence of automatism where he
was negligent with regard to his automatic conduct. This is where the reasonable
man would have foreseen the possibility of causing harm while in a state of
automatism.




4|Page

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller biriamoraa07. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76669 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart