Unit 3 Controlled Assessment Notes- from crime scene to courtroom. Has all assessment criteria with cases and evaluation (very detailed and predicted an A, over 60+ hours of work). Created using textbooks, class notes and the 2021 specification.
Improperly obtained evidence
● E- must relevant, reliable + admissible
● Not always case
Collin Stagg:
○ Suspect- murder Rachel Nickwell
○ Police established ‘honey trap’
○ ‘Lizzie’ (undercover officer) formed relationship over 5 month for murder confession
○ Never confessed- Judge refused Lizzie Jane material (ruled admissible)
○ Judge- "deceptive conduct of grossest kind"
● Police may induce suspect to break law- secure conviction
● Gained by breaking law/violating human rights
● Includes entrapment- police use deception (persuade suspect commit/admit crime)
● May occur in ‘sting’ operations mounted by police (undercover officer poses as
criminal (e.g- drug importer)-induces suspect to commit crime
● English law-doesn’t allow defence of entrapment-such E excluded under S.78
Police+Criminal Evidence Act (PACE)
Christopher Halliwell (PACE laws broken):
○ arrested under suspicion of kidnap- Sian O’Callagan
○ Kidnap-urgent interview (no solicitor)
○ Stephen Fulcher- detective extend urgent interview+conducted it himself
○ Breaking pace laws- should've been cautioned, gone station, given solicitor
○ Halliwell took Fulcher to Sian’s body+admitted 2 murders
○ Confessions ruled inadmissible- only confessed to Fulcher who broke pace laws
○ No formal confession
Pre-trial silence
● Suspects failure to give explanation when questioned/failure to testify in Court- allow
jury draw inference of guilt
● Criminal Justice+Public Order Act 1994
● Even if suspect given legal advice
● Inference cannot establish guilt-other E needed
Taylor Sisters (no comment used to indicate guilt):
○ Wrongfully convicted murder Alison Shaughnessy
○ Convicted circumstantial E
○ Aquitted- verdict ‘unsafe’ suppression of E by police+prejudicial media coverage
○ Michelle-'no comment' (described IRA terrorist-’yet when you answer them they twist
your words anyway’)
○ Taken confession/used indicate guilt
Character evidence and past convictions
● Criminal Justice Act 2003-previous convictions not allowed as E
● Occasions where allowed-helpful court knows bad/good character
● CJA 2003 defines bad character ‘evidence of our disposition towards misconduct’.
● Act provides rule/’gateways’- previous convictions allowed to be given in court
● s. 103 (gateway)- if D has tendency to commit offences,same description/category
● Useful in rape cases:
● Hard to prove is little evidence(DNA)
● Good for jury to hear past allegations/convictions
Sion Jenkins:
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller TeeBott04. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £7.48. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
