100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
vHipp and Anxiety Exam/Essay Summary £5.49   Add to cart

Summary

vHipp and Anxiety Exam/Essay Summary

 15 views  0 purchase

Summary of notes structured in exam and essay format complete with point, evidence, analysis, and critical thinking. Structured based on marking criteria.

Preview 2 out of 8  pages

  • October 10, 2022
  • 8
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (4)
avatar-seller
denh11323
Cool words
 Parcellated into functionally-distinct subdivisions
 sharply demarcated borders

Part I: Dorsal Ventral Dichotomy – a Brief Introduction
- The hippocampus is traditionally established as playing a key role in learning memory
- More recent evidence proposes a dominant view of a dissociation of function along the
septotemporal poles of the hippocampus
- The dorsal hippocampus (DH) is thought to be primarily responsible for spatial navigation and
memory
- The ventral hippocampus (VH) has a more pronounced role in emotional regulation, such as fear
and anxiety
- This essay will discuss the three lines of evidence that support this “dichotomy” hypothesis
o DH lesions, and not VH lesions, disrupt spatial learning in assays such as the Morris water
maze and elevated T/plus maze
o VH lesions, and not DH lesions, impair fear and anxiety-related behaviours
o The anatomical circuitry of the VH and DH are distinct, projecting to regions associated with
emotion regulation and spatial memory, respectively.
- That being said, this behavioural studies and electrophysiological studies suggest the “dichotomy”
approach should be revisited. Instead, researchers have proposed that the septotemporal axis is
organised along a gradient and that the functional roles of each poles are not as distinct as
originally thought.
- This essay will examine the anatomical, functional, and behavioural data relevant to the “dichotomy”
and “gradient” views.
- I will argue that the differences between the DH and VH may not be as distinct as we think, and the
functions may lie along a gradient rather than a dichotomy


Part I: DH in Spatial Memory
Argument: the DH is solely involved in spatial memory but the VH has NO role in spatial memory

Evidence: Moser et al., (1995)  DH lesions impaired performance on Morris water maze

Background Behavioural tests of spatial navigation and memory have been instrumental in our
understanding of hippocampal function
Aim Understand the hippocampal tissue required for normal spatial memory
Method Lesions: injected ibotenic acid into hooded Lister rats within the DH, VH, and complete
hippocampus  lesions varied from 20-100% of total hippocampus volume

Behavioural testing
- Used a Morris water maze where rats were allowed 120 seconds to find a
submerged platform in the opaque water
- The platform position was constant for each rat – never moved spot
- Then they made the rats swim for 60s in the maze when the platform was
removed
- Recorded the time spent swimming
Results - Spatial learning in the water maze was impaired with lesions of as little as 25% of
the DH
- A small traverse block of the hippocampus could support spatial learning as long
as it was the dorsal pole  the DH supports a large proportion, if not all of spatial
memory in the hippocampus
- Lesions to the VH did not exacerbate this spatial memory impairment and did not
have an effect on behaviour
- VH lesions had to be very large in order to produce such a deficit
Conclusion Does this imply different functioning between the septotemporal poles, or is it just based
on relevant spatial scale?
Critical
thinking

, Evidence: Pothuizen et al., (2004): DH lesions impairs spatial memory in a radial arm maze

Background Better than the Morris water maze is not considered that sensitive in detecting spatial
learning defects
Aim Comparative study: whether the DH and VH are dissociable in their roles in spatial
working memory
Method Lesions: Excitotoxic lesions were achieved by using multiple infusions of N-methyl-D-
aspartate (NMDA) dissolved in phosphate buffered saline within the dorsal, ventral, and
entire hippocampus
- Rats were allowed to recover before behavioural testing

4-baited and 4-unbaited version of an 8-arm radial arm maze  allows for concurrent
evaluation of reference and working memory using the same set of spatial cues
- Reference: recognise which of the arms are baited across trials
- Working memory: recognise the rewarded arms that were already visited
compared to those that werent




Results In general, reduction time to complete the trial decreased as training progressed  this is
expected and was no different between the type of lesions

DH lesions:
- Produced a significantly larger amount of reference memory errors compared to
VH lesions  rats had impaired learning in avoiding the never-baited arms
- Rats with DH and complete lesions were both considered equally impaired in
spatial memory
- Rats had impaired learning in avoiding the once-baited arms
- Rats with DH lesions produced higher working memory “incorrect” errors than the
VH lesion
Conclusion DH and VH lesions of similar size resulted in different effects on spatial learning and
memory
- DH, and not VH lesions led to significant impairments in spatial reference and
working memory
- DH lesions produced the same impairments as complete hippocampal lesions in
all aspects of the study
Critical Advantages
thinking - Better than the Morris water maze
o More sensitive in detecting spatial learning defects
o Water maze may not have been sensitive to detect contributions of VH to
spatial learning

Argument: anatomical evidence is consistent with the role of the DH in spatial reference and working
memory  functional dissociation is likely related to the differences in connectivity

Evidence:

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller denh11323. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £5.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£5.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart