100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Trespass: Tort Law Revision Notes £7.99
Add to cart

Other

Trespass: Tort Law Revision Notes

 25 views  0 purchase

Tort law revision notes on trespass to land and to the person (battery, assault and false imprisonment). Based on lecture notes and textbook reading at the University of Nottingham.

Preview 3 out of 21  pages

  • October 13, 2022
  • 21
  • 2018/2019
  • Other
  • Unknown
All documents for this subject (14)
avatar-seller
sammypandora
TRESSPASS

 Intentional, direct, actionable per se, no reasonableness requirement

 Don’t have to show you’ve suffered any adverse consequences to win a claim

 Reynolds v Clarke
 If a man throws a log into highway and in that act hits me I may maintain that trespass
because it is an immediate and direct wrong, but if it lies there and I tumble over it and
receive an injury I may bring an action upon the case – negligence.
 Difference is direct or indirect harm – trespass or negligence?

Intention
 Intended Consequences
 Recklessness
 A person acts recklessly if he or she foresees the risk of harm resulting from an action, yet
nevertheless decides to take that action
 Authority – Pritchard and co-operative group : “‘intentional’ must embrace ‘recklessness’.”

Trespass to Land

 Unlawful, direct and immediate interference with land in the possession of another person,
without the right to enter onto the land, amounts to trespass to land

 Ability of claimant to sue based on possession of land – don’t have to own it. People other than
the owners of land can be claimants, e.g. if you have a lease you can bring a claim in trespass,
because you possess that land

 There must be direct interference with the land

 The interference has to be voluntary (Stone v Smith)
 if pushed or thrown onto someone’s land, not liable as not voluntary (but the person who
pushed may be liable for trespass)

 The defendant need not be aware that they are trespassing
 gives rise to possibility of innocent trespass if defendant is mistaken about ownership of
land/ availability of permission (Conway v George Wimpey & Co)

 No requirement of damage or harm (=actionable per se [of itself])

 Failure to leave
 trespass to land is a continuing tort – this means that fresh liability arises as long as the
tortious conduct continues – e.g. Mark puts ladder on Harry’s land, he is liable at that point
in time + will incur further liability if he subsequently refuses to remove ladder upon Harry’s
request

 Can be an object – park on neighbour’s land, or your bin on their property etc.


 Manifestations of trespass to land (pg 162)

,  Physical entry onto land
 Remaining on land after permission is revoked
 Exceeding the extent of permission granted
 Placing or projecting objects onto the land

 Examples:
 Unauthorised walking on land
 Unauthorised entry into buildings
 Unauthorised throwing of things onto land (Rigby v Northamptonshire CC)
 Unauthorised discharge of sewage into river or stream
 Unauthorised entry into airspace above the land (Kelsen v Imperial Tobacco) but the right to
ownership of airspace was limited to a ‘height as is necessary for the ordinary use and
enjoyment of land’ (Bernstein v Skyviews)

 Defences
 Consent: a person who has permission (express or implied) to enter isn’t a trespasser – e.g.
can enter a shop during opening hours (ensure D hasn’t exceeded the limits of permission if
you are using this defence – e.g. stealing whilst in shop)

 Contractual licence: such as payment of an entry fee or purchase of tickets for a sporting
event

 Statutory Authority: fire service have statutory authority to enter into anyone’s property in
order to put out a fire – can kick your door down to stop fire and you cannot sue; also police
(Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984)

 Necessity: this justifies trespass in emergency situations to deal with perceived threat – it
doesn’t matter if the threat is real provided the defendant believes it’s real

Trespass to Goods

 Unlawful, direct and immediate physical interference with goods amounts to trespass to goods

 Examples
 I pick up chair and smash it – trespass to goods as its somebody else’s chair I have damaged
 Slashing tyres of car
 Carving name into desk

Trespass to the Person

 Definitions (Collins v Wilcock [1984])
 Battery: ‘the actual infliction of unlawful force on another person’

 Assault: ‘an act which causes another person to apprehend the infliction of immediate,
unlawful force on his person’

 False imprisonment: ‘the unlawful imposition of constraint upon another’s freedom of
movement from a particular place’

 Why have trespass torts?
 Compensation and Corrective Justice

,  Vindication – preventing people taking these steps (not about damages)
 Deterrence

 Actionability: Actionable per se: Slater v Swann

 Reasonableness: irrelevant: Weir

 The tort and crime relationship:
 Conduct covered by trespass is also a crime
 Evidence and proof
 Choice of procedure
 Civil battery = lots of different crimes

Trespass vs negligence

 Can’t sue in trespass when damage was inflicted negligently

 Distinction between the two
 Intention vs. Negligence
 Direct vs. Indirect

 No cause of action for trespass where harm was inflicted due to negligence (Letang v Cooper)

 Possibly action for negligence where harm was inflicted intentionally or recklessly

 Reynolds v Clarke – good example of the difference between trespass and negligence

Negligent Trespass?

 Breslin v McKenna
 suggests there should be space for people to be held liable for trespass in person even if
done negligently
 Fowler v Lanning remains authority for the proposition that trespass may be inflicted
negligently” (para 16(c))

Implications of choice

 Why choose trespass or negligence?
 Limitation period better for trespass in person initially but could be extended to trespass in
negligence also (A v Hoare)
 Pleading – must plead and prove intention (or recklessness) in trespass
 Defences – no contributory negligence defence in trespass in person




Battery

 ‘The actual infliction of unlawful force on another person’

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sammypandora. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

56326 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£7.99
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added