Need to know difference between offer and invitation to treat
Offer:
- Certain promise to be bound
- Clear and specified terms
- The conduct or words of the party show certainty
- There is no room for negotiation
Invitation to treat:
- There is room for negotiation
- There is an invitation for offers
- There is a request for information
- Lack of certainty
Test: the intention of the offeror as it would appear to a reasonable person
From offer to acceptance –
- Until the offer is accepted no contract but issue arise re offer:
- Is there a counter offer? Has the offer been withdrawn/revoked
- What about competing offers (battle of the forms)
- Revocation can take place prior to but not after acceptance communicated
- What about unilateral contracts?
- Does the offeor have to know about the offer?
Acceptance –
- ‘An unqualified expression of assent to the terms proposed by the offeror’ (Mck)
- Mirror principle
- Until acceptance no contract exists
- Offer on its own does not lead to contractual liability – not yet consensus ad idem (metting
of the mind) on objective view
Counteroffer: effect? How do you know there is one?
Hyde v Wrench (1840): termination by counteroffer or other rejection by offeree/ the proposal to
buy for £950 was a counteroffer; it had terminated the original offer so that the P purported
acceptance of it later was no more than a fresh offer BUT
- Offer to sell farm for 1000 – other party offered 950 – then send a letter saying they would
pay 1000
- Offeror never replied – no contract – was treated as a counteroffer
Stevenson, Jacques & Co v MacLean (1880): mere inquiry?
- Have to be careful because sometimes what can seem like an offer and acceptance can be
seen more closely on the facts and correspondence to be a mere inquiry for more
information
- Telex offered to sell a large quantity of warrants for iron for 40 shillings a ton, the offer to be
open until Monday. On monday, S replied aksing ‘whether you would accept forty for
, Contract Law
delivery over two months, or if not, longest limit you would give’, Held: was not a counter
offer just a mere inquiry
- Sought to rely on Hyde but court rejected it – it was just an inquiry and not a rejection of the
offer
- The P succeed and claimed damages
- The Ps had accepted the offer prior to revocation – they were simply asking a question
Gibson v Manchester – where is the offer?
- Specific performace was sought by the claimants
- No binding contract because no offer capable of acceptance had been made
- Equivocal language ‘may be prepapred to sell’
- Statements were merely invitation to treat and not offers
- Lord Denning look at totality of the transaction
- Public policy?
Battle of the forms:
- This occurs where parties do business together, but while appearing to go through the
process of offer and acceptance, they exchange paperwork which in fact leads to a written
(and perhaps unwritten) dispute over whose terms are to govern the deal
BRS v Arthur Crutchley Ltd (1968)
- Storage of valuable whiskey, limited clause, application of classical analysis of offer/counter-
offer/acceptance
- General principle: the latest shot in a battle of the forms tends to prevail, because the
doctrine of counter-offer dictates that it represents the current offer on the table between
the parties and terminates earlier ones
Butler Machine Tool Co v Ex-cell (1979) – battle of forms case
- Commercial parties often try to gain strategic advantage by using their own standard forms
- When forms sent back and forth it is difficult to ascertain at what point agreement was
reached
- Looks at all the documents to see if agreement was reached on all material terms
- The battle is won by the party who put forth the lastest t and c that are not objected to by
the other party
- It was found that the sellor could not live up to the uplift because his terms could not prevail
- P were sellers who offered to sell a machine tool for 75000 deliver in 10 months
- Offer said to be on sellers terms which ‘shall prevail over any terms… in buyers orders’
- Buyers order contained different terms and tear off slip stating acceptance on terms and
conditions ‘stated thereon’
- Sellers returned slip with covering letter stating were accepting in accordance with their
original quote. Late delivery – sellers claim price variation clause not in buyers terms
- CA find for buyers on classical analysis: buyers order was a counter offer because no mirror.
Sellers accepted by returning tear off slip
- Lawton and Bridge came to the same conclusion as Denning albeit with different reasoning
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller edenwillis2. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £5.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.