Lecture notes
Misrepresentation
- Module
- Law of Contract
- Institution
- University Of Southampton (UOS)
Full Contract law lecture notes, with cases, case descriptions, current law and everything that could be on the exam.
[Show more]
Content preview
Misrepresentation Term – misrep, termination – to put the party in the position
they would’ve been had the contract been performed as
promised.
Misrepresentation: Rescission (damages for
misrepresentation) -To put party back in the position they
were in before the contract was made.
Actionable misrepresentation:
A misrepresentation is a false statement of fact, made to the
claimant, which induced him to enter a contract.
1) Statement
2) False
3) Made to the other party
4) Inducement
1) Statement:
a) Silence-
Keates v Earl of Cadogan – Earl leant house to Mr. Keates and
knew Keates wanted to live in this house but knew the house was
about the fall down. Keates wanted to get out of contract after
seeing the house. Ct said Earl never said house was liveable – no
false statement. Silence can’t be misrepresentation.
Caveat Emptor – Let the buyer beware, buyer should have asked
about quality of goods and make necessary enquires. Sellers
have no liability to say- just can’t make a false statement.
Exception:
- Contracts of “the utmost good faith” (uberrmiae fidei) – these
kind of contracts it is near enough impossible for the other
party to find out all the facts – e.g. insurance contracts
b) Conduct-
Spice girls Ltd v Aprilia World Service – contract with Italian
company, to sponsor them in their tours. Contracted concluded –
company thought Spice Girls would stay together- Spice girls
knew one of the girls was going to leave the group in May, before
the tour, but also never said explicitly they were going to stay
together. Ct said conduct made a statement they would stay
together – going to a photo shoot and appearing as a group-
therefore saying they would stay together.
Gordon v Sellico – Flat covered in dry rot. Seller employed
contractor to get rid of dry rot. Contractor didn’t do job and just
covered it up. Buyers sued for misrep, because dry rot came
through. Seller didn’t say anything – but Ct said conduct made a
statement, by covering it up – saying it was in good condition.
c) Mere puff-
Dimmock v Hallett – sale about land, that the land would be
fertile – but it was actually useless and wasteland. Ct said that
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lilyorr. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now