Lecture notes
Frustration
- Module
- Contract Law
- Institution
- Undefined
Full Contract law lecture notes, with cases, case descriptions, current law and everything that could be on the exam.
[Show more]
Content preview
Frustration Event affecting contractual performance that arises after the
formation of the contract
Circumstance after contract made, contract is impossible to perform
CF. common mistake (event arising prior to contract formation)
Foundation case: Taylor v Caldwell –
Classic early case
Rental of Surrey Music Hall for 4 days to hold ‘grand concerts’
After contracting, but before first performance, Hall was destroyed
by fire
Not fault of either party
No express provision in contract
“That excuse is by law implied, because from the nature of the
contract is is apparent that the parties contracted on the basis of
the continued existence of the particular person or chattel” – An
implied term, not written in contract that if there was fire
the contract would cease but implied- contract ended. –
giving in effect what the parties intended
“We think, therefore, that the Music hall having ceased to exist,
without fault of either party, both party are excused”
The legal basis of frustration:
Is the doctrine an example of an implied term?
Or is It an independent rule of law, and not based on what the
parties presumably intended?
- James Scott & Sons Ltd v Del Sel – "A tiger has escaped from a
travelling menagerie. The milkgirl fails to deliver the milk. Possibly
the milkman may be exonerated from any breach of contract; but,
even so, it would seem hardly reasonable to base that exoneration
on the ground that 'tiger days excepted' must be held as if written
into the milk contract."- fact that they didn’t see the risk is not
important- just whether it is a sufficiently serious situation to not
write it down.
- Davis Contractors v Fareham UDC-
Contract to build 78 houses in 8 months
Lack of skilled labour. Took 22 months to complete
Detailed consideration of legal basis for intervention
They said the contract must have been frustrated as they have
reasonable excuse.
“the true action of the court which consists in applying an
objective rule of the law of contract to the contractual
obligations that the parties have imposed on themselves” –
as an independent rule of law, was this a sufficiently significant
interference – objective test
“Frustration occurs whenever the law recognises that,
without default of either party, a contractual obligation has
become incapable of being performed because the
circumstances in which performance is called for would
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lilyorr. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now