100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
The Flanker task (based on Eriksen and Eriksen, 1974): main body. £5.49   Add to cart

Essay

The Flanker task (based on Eriksen and Eriksen, 1974): main body.

 4 views  0 purchase

A 2000 word write up on the Flanker task in the format of research report minus the title page, abstract and appendices.

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

  • January 25, 2023
  • 7
  • 2021/2022
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
All documents for this subject (3)
avatar-seller
RGYN
PSYC2092 COGNITIVE ASSIGNMENT




Introduction



The flanker task is a task derived from experiments conducted by Eriksen & Eriksen

(1974) that involves the identification of a single item when surrounded by use congruent and

incongruent stimuli. In the original Eriksen & Eriksen (1974) study letters where the used stimuli,

the surrounding letters were labelled as noise letters with these either being response

compatible or incompatible. From the series of experiments that took place it was found that that

the incompatible noise letters hindered the reaction time of the participant when compared to

the compatible noise letters, they also found that the spacing between the shown letters

affected the reaction times too with larger spacing resulting in faster reaction times. There has

been follow up studies since the original Eriksen & Eriksen study, one of these follow ups was

conducted by Sanders & Lamer (2002). In this study the flanker effect was revisited with 4

different experiments investigating the different possible variables that could be at play such as

distance from the screen the experiment is taking place on. This study provides further evidence

that supports the claims of the flanker effect taking place on perception. However, despite

finding sufficient psychological evidence for the effect, they only focus on the reaction times of

the participants and not the answers given. Further investigation on this factor may highlight

possible inconsistencies within the theory and cause a change in the idea.



A study did investigate this aspect along with a comparison with another task. Stine et al

(2008) looked at the flanker task and the spatial task. In their study a comparison was made

, PSYC2092 COGNITIVE ASSIGNMENT

between the two tasks with how participants performed but they looked at the percentage of

correct answers as well as the usual recording of the reaction times. Their findings on reaction

times showed what had been seen before with the flanker task but their look into the correct

answers was able to show that participants were able to complete the flanker task with near

perfect accuracy when the stimuli was congruent. When it came to the incongruent responses it

was seen that the participants were noticeably more prone to provide an incorrect response as

well as it is taking longer to provide such response. This study fills a gap in knowledge, but more

research would need to be done to concretely say that incongruence leads to more incorrect

responses. Which this study conducted here aims to address.



For this experiment it was hypothesized that there would be a significant difference in

the reaction times between the congruent and incongruent responses with the congruent

response time being faster than the incongruent response time. Another hypothesis is that there

will be an increase in incorrect answers given in the task in response to the incongruent stimuli.




Method



Design –

The conducted study took the form of a lab experiment requiring the completion of a

task. This task recorded the reaction times of participant doing the task, this was the dependent

variable. The independent variable was whether the stimuli was congruent or incongruent.



Materials –

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller RGYN. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £5.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

75759 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£5.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart