100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Social influence £3.49   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Social influence

 34 views  0 purchase
  • Institution
  • AQA

Full social influence notes including key studies and evaluation as well. All content is covered and red writing is key information to help remembering.

Preview 2 out of 11  pages

  • March 14, 2023
  • 11
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (5)
avatar-seller
rubeemc
Chapter ONE Social Influence | Psychology
Rubee McEnaney-Cox
Social influence:
A change in a person’s behaviour or opinions as a result of real or imagined pressure from a person or group of people

Types of conformity
Internalisation=Deepest level
Change = public behaviour (act) and private beliefs
Long-term change
Acceptance

Identification=Middle level
Change = public behaviour & private belief, BUT only when they are with the group
Short-term acceptance of group norms

Compliance=Lowest level
Change = public behaviour (act), but not private beliefs
Short-term membership

Why do people conform?
Informational social influence=Desire to be right
Normative social influence=Desire to be liked

Explanations for Conformity
Informational Social Influence (ISI) Normative Social Influence (NSI)

-What is right? -What is normal?
-Cognitive -Emotional
-Who has better information? -Gain social approval

Confederate: a non participant working for the experimenter who has been briefed to answer in a
particular way

Asch study (1951)
Aim:
To find out the extent of which social pressure from a majority could affect a person to conform
Procedure:

-123 male students (7 confederates and one naïve participant)
-Line judgement task using 2 cards
-Naïve pps sat second to last – say out loud which line (A, B or C) was most like the target line length
-The correct answer was always obvious
-Confederates: same incorrect answer on 12 out of 18 trials (Critical Trials)
-He wanted to see if the real pp would conform to the majority, even when the answer was clearly

Findings:
Naïve participants conformed to the incorrect answers on 36.8% of the critical trials
75% of the participants conformed on at least one critical trial
25% of the participants never conformed
Control group: Less than 1% of the participants gave an incorrect answer
Conclusions:
Compliance- public not private
NSI- to fit in with the group
Real participants went along with the majority

, Chapter ONE Social Influence | Psychology
Rubee McEnaney-Cox
Variables affecting Conformity
Factors What they did What they found

Group Size 3 confederates Conformity is highest at 3 confederates conformed on 32% of trials

Unanimity 1 confederate sometimes disagreed with Participant behaved more independently
(fully agree) the other = Conformity dropped to 5%

Task Increased difficulty- Comparison lines Conformity increased: ISI🡪 plays greater role as it is more ambiguous-
Difficulty more similar to the stimulus line more likely to look for guidance

Evaluation of Conformity:
STRENGTHS WEAKNESSES

-Research support for ISI, particularly where people are -Some research shows that NSI does not affect
unaware of the correct answer everyone’s behaviour in the same way
-Lucas et al (2006) asked students to give answers for -People who are less concerned with being liked are less
mathematical problems that were easy or more difficult affected by NSI than those who care more about being
-Greater conformity to incorrect answers when they liked
were more difficult, rather than when they were easier -Such people are described as being nAffiliators
-This was most true for students who rated their -These people are described as having an
mathematical ability as poor affiliation/need for being in a relationship with others
-People conform in situations where they feel they don’t -This shows that the desire to be liked underlies
know the answer, as predicted by the ISI explanation conformity for some people more than others
-We look to other people and assume they know better -Therefore, there are individual differences in conformity
and therefore, must be right that cannot be fully explained by one general theory of
Counter argument: situational pressures
-ISI does not take into account individual differences, as
it does not affect everyone’s behaviour
-Asch (1955) found that students were less conformist
(28%) than other participants (37%)
-Suggests that there are individual differences which
impact conformity and should also be considered

-Asch’s research is supported from other studies for the -Limited application- Asch only tested men
effects of task difficulty -Other research suggests women may be more
-Lucas et al (2006) asked their pps to solve ‘easy’ and conformist because they care more about social
‘hard’ maths problems relationships and being accepted than men
-Pps were given answers from 3 other students-Pps -Cultural problem since the men in Asch's study were all
conformed more often when the problems were harder from the USA (individualist culture)
-Asch was correct in claiming that task difficulty is one -People are more concerned about themselves as
variable that affects conformity individuals rather than their social groups
Counter argument: -Similar studies conducted in China (collectivist culture)
-Lucas et al’s study found that conformity is more have found that conformity rates are higher because the
complex than Asch suggested social group is more important than the individual
-Pps with high confidence in their maths abilities -Asch's findings may only be relevant for American men
conformed less on hard tasks than those with low because he did not take into account gender and
confidence cultural differences
-The interaction between individual differences (e.g.
confidence) and situational variables (task difficulty) is
also an important factor when looking for conformity
-But Asch did not research the role of individual factors

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller rubeemc. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67474 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£3.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart