Summary
Summary Edexcel A Level Psychology Notes - Criminal Psychology
- Institution
- PEARSON (PEARSON)
A* notes for the Criminal Psychology Module at A Level - the ONLY notes you need for this course!
[Show more]
Content preview
1Criminal Psychology
- Specialist area of psychology that addresses wide range of topics e.g. understanding
antisocial behaviour and what factors contribute to such behaviour
- This knowledge is then used in a variety of settings, including assisting the police to gain
information from witnesses, within the courtroom and after sentencing to treat offenders
- Helps to understand antisocial behaviour and those who commit it which helps to reduce
this behaviour
Introduction:
- Crime and Disorder Act (1998) defines anti-social behaviour as ‘acting in a way that caused
or is likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress to one or more people not of the same
household as the person acting in this way’
- Behaviours that are considered anti-social - being drunk, excessively noisy, criminal
damage, taking drugs and intimidating others
- Psychologists seek to explain antisocial behaviour through biological and social factors
- These factors are not causal so won’t definitely makes the person act in a
criminal/antisocial way
6.1 Content
6.1.1 Biological Explanations
Brain Injury
- May be caused by an accident, illness, drug/alcohol use
- ‘Traumatic’ brain injury occurs though direct damage to the brain such as a car accident or
being injured or assaulted in the head
- Alcohol has a toxic effect on the CNS and interferes with the absorption of vitamin B1
which is an important brain nutrient
- Being intoxicated impairs balance and decision making, thus can contribute to falls or
accidents that may injure the brain
- Personality may change as a result of brain injury or the person may behave in a way that is
untypical of them pre-trauma, e.g. Phineas Gage
- These behaviours may involve aggression or being reckless
- Williams et al (2010) found 60% of the 196 prisoners investigated received some sort of
brain injury
- Noted that adults with traumatic brain injury were relatively younger at entry into the
prison system than those without brain injury and reported higher rates of reoffending
- These injuries lead to a lack of development of temperance, social judgement and control
of impulses
- Risk taking behaviours and control impulses were also found to be more common
- These behaviours are directly associated with criminality
Evaluation
- When reviewing influence of brain injury on criminal behaviour, other comorbid conditions
should be mentioned
- E.g. many offenders often have history of substance misuse, may have been exposed to
violence as a child
,2
- These factors are known to increase criminal behaviour
- Therefore, difficult to establish a cause and effect relationship between brain injury and
criminal/aggressive behaviour because of these other factors may be involved
- Highlighted by Kreutzer et al (1991) - unable to prove or disprove a cause and effect
between traumatic brain injury and violence
- Out of 74 patients, 20% had been arrested pre-injury and 10% post
- Substance abuse, traumatic brain injury and crime interconnected (most arrests occurred
after use of alcohol or other drugs)
- The study concluded that criminal behaviour may be a result of post-injury changes leading
to poor judgment
- Further research by Kreutzer (1995) suggests that without the presence of substance abuse
history, brain damage was not a risk factor for criminal behaviour
The Amygdala and its Relation to Brain Injury
- Controls human emotions, therefore damage to this part of brain may result in problems
with how people express themselves
- Damage may also increase impulsiveness or irritability and aggression
- E.g. may have excessive reactions to their emotions because they cannot control them
- Pardini et al 2014 - individuals with smaller amygdale three times more likely to exhibit
aggression, violence and psychopathic features 3 years later
- Thus suggesting amygdala size can predict violence
- Cannon and Britton (1925) - carried out a sham rage study by severing neural connections
to the cortex of cats
- Sham Rage - an emotional state found in animals
- When provoked, cats exhibited emotional behaviour associated with rage and aggression
- Further research revealed that source of the rage came from the temporal reg ion,
specifically the amygdala
- When amygdala removed, animals became more placid - if stimulated, aggression
displayed
- Shows that amygdala has an important role in production of hostile behaviour
- Bard (1940) and Swantje et al (2012) - support idea that the amygdala plays an important
role in aggression but extrapolating animal research to humans is problematic in that it is
difficult to generalise - e.g. the prefrontal cortex in animals is smaller
- Raine et al (1997) - Significant brain differences were shown between the brain structure
(particularly the amygdala) of murders and control conditions
- A total of 41 NGRIs with a range of mental illnesses were studied using a PET scanner after
completing a continuous performance task
- Results showed lower glucose levels in the prefrontal cortex, which had previously been
linked to impulsivity
- The amygdala and hippocampus, which are responsible for learning also showed abnormal
functioning, explaining why the NGRI participants had all committed murder
,3
Evaluation:
- ‘Sham rage’ studies conducted on animals can be critiqued for lacking generalisability to
humans
- Animals do not have the capacity to inhibit their aggression with higher order thinking, thus
sham rage studies only apply to animals
- However, Narabayashi et al (1963) conducted psychosurgery on human patients with
aggressive behaviour by severing the amygdala from the limbic system and found a mood
stabilising effect in most patients (but not all)
- Demonstrates that not everyone with specific brain structures, who have these
abnormalities will become aggressive leading to the assumption that other factors must be
evident
- Robert Hare wrote book ‘Snake in Suits; When Psychopaths go to Work.’
- Highlighted how psychopaths are not just found amongst a criminal population; some traits
such as callousness and a lack of empathy arguable make individuals suitable for high level
management positions
XYY Syndrome
- Men have sex chromosomes XY and are governed by androgens, e.g. testosterone
- Females have sex chromosomes XX that are governed by oestrogen
- XYY syndrome occurs when some males are born with an extra Y chromosome
- It is a genetic condition whereby these males have a total of 47 chromosomes
- Occurs in 1 out of 1000 male births
- It is not inherited and randomly occurs at the time of conception
- Most boys with XYY have a normal development, although some boys will grow faster and
taller than usual
- However, some studies have shown a lower than average intelligence level and some may
display problems with behaviour and be easily distracted
- Has been thought to make men overly aggressive and lack empathy leading to it being
known as ‘super-male’ syndrome
Evaluation:
- Not likely to know true extent of the prevalence of XYY due to practicality of looking at
genetics of all male offenders to determine if they are XYY
- This requires skilled staff and is resource intensive
- That said, Theilgaard study does show a small presence of XYY men among a criminal
population, although it cannot be the only reason for criminal behaviour - if so, the rate of
XYY would be 100%
- She found that men with XYY were found to have lower levels of intelligence, therefore the
higher than expected number of XYY men in the offender population may be a
consequence of the learning difficulties associated with the condition rather than XYY itself
- Women also engage in criminal behaviour, yet XYY fails to account for this amongst women
- Mednick 1988 conducted a study of over 31,000 men and found no strong correlation
between the presence of an extra Y chromosome and criminality
, 4
Other Genetic Explanations for Criminality
- Twin studies - MZ twins share all genetic information, whilst DZ twins share 50%
- If MZ twins are more alike in terms of aggressive behaviour than DZ twins, this could be
due to genes rather than environment
- Slutske et al (1997) shown there is higher incidence of conduct disorder in twins when
compared to singletons
- One problem with twin studies is that they will often be brought up together in a similar
way so hard to say whether the concordance rates are caused by genetic or environmental
factors
- Adoption studies - Hutchings and Mednick (1997) studied male adoptees and discovered
that 85.7% of the males with a criminal record had a birth father with one too
- That said, also noted that male adoptees without a criminal record had a criminal father
31.1% of the time
- This does suggest a link between criminal behaviours and genetics
Personality
- Eysenck is 1 of the key theorists who has looked at personality traits; our enduring
characteristic that make us who we are and that influence our decisions and behaviour
- Examined following dimensions; extraversion (E), introversion (I), neuroticism (N), stability
(S) and psychoticism (P) suggesting that these dimensions relate to the underlying
functioning of the individuals nervous system
- These dimensions influenced by biology could explain criminality, known as the PEN
personality
- Extraversion - outgoing behaviour, e.g. want excitement, easily bored
- Introversion - reserved and reflective, prefer solitary
- Neuroticism - emotional instability, associated with anxiety, fear, depression and envy
- Stability - emotionally calm people who are unreactive and worried
- Psychoticism - individuals lack empathy, are aggressive, impersonal and cold
- Eysenck (1990) proposed the arousal theory to explain the causal roots of the three
dimensions personality
- Concept suggests that individuals are motivated to act in a certain way to maintain level of
physiological arousal
- When arousal levels drop below our personal optimal level, we engage in stimulating
behaviour to increase arousal
- Explained extraversion in terms of cortical arousal via the ascending reticular activating
system (ARAS) in the brain
- ARAS system transmits messages to limbic system, triggering the release of hormones and
neurotransmitters
- Introverts require less external stimulation or arousal explaining how they are less outgoing
and risk-taking whereas extraverts require greater amounts of external stimulation as they
have an under-active ARAS
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lucyamyl. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £7.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
55628 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now