100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
History war of the roses unit 5 essay £9.49   Add to cart

Essay

History war of the roses unit 5 essay

 37 views  0 purchase

war of the roses OCR history essay grade A/A* essay full example available to use

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • April 16, 2023
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A
All documents for this subject (45)
avatar-seller
EssaysByDina
Was Richard III’s seizure of the throne ‘greedy ambition’ or ‘self-
preservation’?
The debate regarding Richard III’s seizure has been centred on 2 conflicting lines of
arguments: either if the throne was captured merely because of Richard III’s greedy
ambition, his long-held desire to become king or simply self-preservation, a series of
circumstances that compelled Richard to either take the throne or face destruction.
There is much support for the second claim that Richard had seized the crown out of panic
and self-preservation; he was actually seen as smart since he was doing what was best for
him in a dangerous situation. Contemporary writers have written on subject to Richard III’s
behaviour, C. Carpenter argued in his passage in 1997 that there are 2 logical ways of
looking at the usurpation: “either it was the ruthless act of a man who saw his opportunity
and took it, or it was an act of panic”. Despite Richard’s countless ruthless behaviour there is
not much to suggest that Richard was plotting on seizing the crown from as early as 1471;
since he was anything but loyal to Edward IV before his death. There is also no evidence to
prove there was any animosity between Richard and Elizbeth Woodville, while he was duke,
however despite this there are allegations that Richard III had spent most of his time during
Edwards second reign in the north away from court; this if taken into consideration and
looked into thoroughly may have led to the suspicions that Richard has been planning on
capturing the crown earlier then portrayed.
In spite of this, there has been however ample evidence proving that Richard and Elizabeth
Woodville did not trust each other and were both manoeuvring to try and exclude the other
as much as possible from power. In addition to this after Richard had made his initial move
to preserve his position as reagent, Richard was then faced with prospect of the same
Woodville threat that Edward V once faced during his majority rule, due to Edwards favour
of the Woodville’s at stony Stratford in relation to his uncle and half-brother this was a
sharp contrast between his relationship with his other uncle Richard, Duke of Gloucester
who he hardly knew which meant he was reluctant in trusting him. This was highly likely to
have been a huge problem for Richard since Edward was in his way and in a few years,
Edward would probably replace Richard with the Woodville’s; who may have the potential
in taking their revenge and destroying him. Therefore, it was a matter of self-preservation
that Edward needed to be removed and for Richard to become king
On the other hand, there is also much support for the first claim that Richard was greedy for
power and had long held desire to be king. Contemporary writers have written regarding to
the mass support the first claim has. Dominic Mancini wrote of Richard as having an ‘insane
lust for power’. There is potential that Dominic Marcini’s passage are highly likely since he
was in England at the time of the usurpation of Richard III and he wrote his account of this
event before the end of 1483 and also the fact that he wrote objectively as the events
unfolded. To add on, the execution of Hastings looks extremely suspicious to those who
view the event deeply and thoroughly, the execution looked like being part of a long-term
plan to take the throne. Other contemporary writers; like M.Hicks wrote in relation to the
greedy ambition that Richard III had towards claiming the throne he writes that Richard

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller EssaysByDina. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £9.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

76669 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£9.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart