100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
criminal damage £6.59
Add to cart

Case

criminal damage

 4 views  0 purchase

MY NOTES for end of year exams

Preview 1 out of 2  pages

  • May 31, 2023
  • 2
  • 2022/2023
  • Case
  • Rita d’alton-harrison
  • A
All documents for this subject (6)
avatar-seller
yangjensherpa
Criminal law criminal damage ACT 1971
4 OFFENCES: S1(1) CRIMINAL DAMAGE

AR -> DAMAGE OR DESTROY PROPERTY BELONGING TO ANOTHER W/O LAWFUL EXCUSE
MR -> INTENTIONALLY OR RECKLESSLY

S1(2) CRIMINAL DAMAGE ENDANGERING LIFE
S1(3) ARSON
S2 THREATENING TO DESTROY OR DAMAGE PROPERTY
S3 POSSESSING ANYTHING WITH INTENT TO DESTROY OR DAMAGE PROPERTY

‘AGGRAVATED CRIMINAL DAMAGE’
AR -> *BELONGING TO HIMSELF OR ANOTHER
MR -> *WITH INTENTION OR RECKLESSLY ((ENDANGER LIFE))

STEER CASE WHERE D WENT TO FORMER BUSINESS PARTNER HOUSE AFTER DISPUTE
AND USED GUN TO FIRE SEVERAL SHOTS THROUGH WINDOW. WAS NOT CHARGED FOR
S1(2) AS ENDANGER TO LIFE MUST BE CAUSED BY PROPERTY DAMAGE BUT IN THIS CASE,
CAME FROM GUN.
‘ARSON’
AR -> *USING FIRE
MR -> INTENTIONALLY OR RECKLESSLY

‘THREATENING TO DESTROY OR DAMAGE PROPERTY’
AR -> *THREATEN
MR -> WITH INTENTION OR KNOWLEDGE THAT ANOTHER WOULD FEAR THREAT WOULD BE

CARRIED OUT ((THAT THREAT OF DAMAGE/DESTRUCTION WOULD LIKELY ENDANGER LIFE))
‘POSSESS ANYTHING WITH INTENT TO DESTROY OR DAMAGE PROPERTY’
AR -> *POSSESSING ANYTHING LIKELY TO DESTROY/DAMAGE PROPERTY
MR -> *WITH INTENTION TO USE IT OR CAUSE/PERMIT ANOTHER PERSON TO USE IT TO
DESTROY/DAMAGE PROPERTY
OR
*WITH KNOWLEDGE IT CAN BE USED TO D/DP ((OR THAT OF THE USER IN A WAY LIKELY TO
ENDANGER LIFE))
‘MEANING OF DAMAGE’

ROE V KINGLERLEE CASE WHERE D SMEARED MUD AND GRAFFITI ON PRISON WALL
WHICH WAS S3. IT MUST BE MORE THAN TRIVIAL TO AMOUNT TO DAMAGE AND REQUIRE
MORE WORK TO REMOVE AND REDUCE VALUE OF THE DAMAGED PROPERTY. AS IT COST
COUNCIL MONEY TO REMOVE GRAFFITI, IT WAS CRIMINAL DAMAGE.

GAYFORD V CHOULER CASE WHERE THE DAMAGE DOES NOT HAVE TO BE PERMANENT.
TRESPASSER TRAMPLED ON HIS LONG GRASS AND THIS AMOUNTED TO DAMAGING
PROPERTY.

A (A JUVENILE) V R CASE WHERE DAMAGES MUST BE MORE THAN MERE TRIVIAL. IN THIS
CASE, THE D HAD SPAT ON THE OFFICERS JACKET WHICH WAS TOO MINOR TO BE
CRIMINAL DAMAGE AS THEY COULD JUST WIPE IT OFF.
S10(1) DEFINITION OF PROPERTY

○ MUST ONLY BE TANGIBLE PROPERTY

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller yangjensherpa. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £6.59. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

53340 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£6.59
  • (0)
Add to cart
Added