100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Summary Unlawful act manslaughter - Criminal law £3.49   Add to cart

Summary

Summary Unlawful act manslaughter - Criminal law

 10 views  0 purchase
  • Institution
  • OCR

Summary of unlawful act manslaughter for OCR, written by an A* student

Preview 1 out of 3  pages

  • June 7, 2023
  • 3
  • 2021/2022
  • Summary
All documents for this subject (145)
avatar-seller
scarlettbuckle
Involuntary - someone is dead but there is no malice aforethought
AR: D commits an unlawful and dangerous act that causes death.
MR: D only needs MR for the initial unlawful act.
Unlawful act: the act must be a crime within itself and if any element is
missing then it is not UAM (Lamb). It must be an act, not an omission (Lowe).
The unlawful act doesn’t need to be aimed at the V (Mitchell). The unlawful
act doesn’t need to be aimed at a person at all (Goodfellow).
The unlawful act must also be dangerous: Objective bystander test for
dangerous comes from the case of Church, would a sober and reasonable
bystander have realised the risk of harm? Dawson - sober and reasonable
person only needs to see the risk of some harm, the risk must be of physical
harm, the bystander must have the same knowledge as D at the scene. Watson
- if D learns anything throughout the unlawful act about the dangerousness
of their actions, then the S & R bystander learns it too. R v JM & SM - no need
to foresee the particular type of harm, it is enough that the S & R person
would foresee some harm.
The act must cause death: D must be a factual and legal cause and there must
be no new intervening acts to break the chain of causation. (Causation cases
and rules)
MR: only needs MR for initial unlawful act, e.g. if a battery caused death then
D only needed to have intended to or be reckless as to the application of
unlawful force to be liable for UAM. Newbury & Jones - irrelevant whether D
saw any risk of harm.
“I only hit him once” scenario - the act was unlawful as it was a battery, it is a
dangerous act as it can be foreseen that there will be injury from a punch,
there are no causation issues because although there was extensive surgery,
there is no evidence of medical negligence, the MR applies because he had the
MR for the initial unlawful act.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller scarlettbuckle. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

67096 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£3.49
  • (0)
  Add to cart