Presentation
Rylands v Fletcher
- Module
- A2 Unit G157 - Law of Torts
- Institution
- OCR
This is the AO1 Knowledge on Rylands v Fletcher, it had key info and key cases.
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
Rylands v Fletcher• A thing likely to do mischief if it escapes:
• The thing need not be inherently hazardous. It need only be a thing likely to cause
• Tort in its own right. damage if it escapes, for example:
• A flagpole – Shiffman v The Grand Priory of St John (1936)
• Form of strict liability – defendant may be liable •
•
Branches from yew trees – Crowhurst v Amersham Burial Board (1879)
A fairground ride – Hale v Jennings Bros (1938)
without being negligent. • Electricity – Hiller v Air Ministry (1962)
• However in Transco v Stockport (2004) – damages for personal injuries are not
• Consequently, it is controversial and therefore recoverable under this rule.
restrictive approach has been taken to imposing • Escape:
liability under Ryland v Fletcher. • There must be an escape from the defendant’s land. An injury inflicted by the
accumulation of a hazardous substance on the land itself will not invoke liability. A key
• Case details for Ryland v Fletcher (1868): case on escape is Read v Lyons (1947).
• In British Celansese v AH Hunt (1969), the judge said the escape should be ‘from a set of
• Def built a reservoir on his land, above a disused mine. circumstances over which the defendant has control to set of circumstances where he
Water from the reservoir filtered through to the disused does not.’
mine shafts and spread to a neighbouring working mine • Non-Natural use of land:
owned by the claimant, causing extensive damage. • This means the use must be ‘extraordinary and unusual’. A use may be extra-ordinary
and unusual at one time or in one place, but not so at another place.
• Requirements to bring a claim: • A key case for this Transco v Stockport MBC (2004)
• Accumulation on the defendant’s land • Remoteness of damage:
• A thing likely to do mischief if it escapes • As in nuisance. Liability is subject to the rules on remoteness of damage – Cambridge
Water v Eastern Counties Leather (1994).
• Escape
• Non-natural use of the land • There is no liability for pure economic loss under Rylands v Fletcher – Weller c
• Damage that is not too remote. Foot and Mouth Disease Research Institute (1966)
• Defences:
• Accumulation: • Act of a stranger: D has complete defence if the escape was caused by the act of a
• Def must bring a hazardous thing onto their land stranger over which D had no control and whose actions could not have been
reasonably foreseen – Perry v Kendricks Transport Limited (1956) in contract with Ribee
and keep it there – Giles v Walker (1890); Ellison v v Norrie (2000)
Ministry of Defence (1997) • Act of God: This has the same meaning as under private nuisance, but there is a
• Thing must be accumulated for the defendant’s own different case example – Carstairs v Taylor (1871)
• Statutory Authority: This has the same meaning as under private nuisance, but there is a
purposes – Dunne v North West Gas Board (1964) different case example – Green v Chelsea Waterworks Co. (1894)
• The thing that escapes need not be the thing • Consent/benefit: If C receives a benefit from the thing accumulated, they may be
accumulated – Miles v Forest Rock Granite (1918) deemed to have consented to its accumulation – Peters v Prince of Wales Theatre
(1943).
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller hafsahbegum1. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £5.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
53068 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now