100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
theft summary sheet £2.99   Add to cart

Summary

theft summary sheet

 13 views  0 purchase

Summary: Explore the concept of theft in detail with this comprehensive study resource. Walk through the necessary elements that constitute theft, examining key cases and acts that have shaped its legal framework. Gain a deep understanding of the essential elements of theft, such as dishonesty, app...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 6  pages

  • No
  • Unknown
  • June 27, 2023
  • 6
  • 2022/2023
  • Summary
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (145)
avatar-seller
happinesstosh
-Theft-
THE THEFT ACT 1968
The Theft Act defines theft in section 1 as:

A person who dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention of permanently
depriving the other of it

Sections 2-6 of the act help with the meaning of the words in the definition:

Section 2 - Dishonesty
Section 3 - Appropriates
Section 4 - Property
Section 5 - Belonging to another
Section 6 - Intention of permanently depriving


ACTUS REUS OF THEFT
Section 3,4 and 5 make up the actus reus of theft

SECTION 3 - Appropriation

“Any assumption by a person of the rights of an owner amounts to an appropriation, and this includes, where
he has come by the property (innocently or not) without stealing it, any later assumption of a right to it by
keeping or dealing with it as owner.”

Assuming the rights of the owner - It is the act of taking

The rights of the owner include:

- Selling it (R v Pitham and Hehl - D sold someone's furniture )
- Destroying it
- Possessing it
- Consuming it
- Using it
- Modifying it (R v Morris - Switching labels)
- Lending it
- Hiring it out

Appropriation with Consent

Where what the victim consented to does not happen

(Lawrence) - D was a taxi driver who drove an Italian student who spoke little English and the tourist offered £1 but
D said more money was needed and took £6 from his open wallet

D argues the V had consented to the taking of money however the court stated that there was appropriation

(Gomez) - D was a shop assistant who lied to the manager that two cheques presented by a friend were valid

Although the appropriation took place with the owners consent it is still amount to appropriation under the definition
in the Theft Act

, Appropriation without deception

Taking advantage of a vulnerable victim for the defendants gain or advantage

(Hinks) - D was a carer of a 53 year old man with a low IQ. D persuaded the victim to gift her almost all of his
savings (£60,000)

The HOLs held that even though it was a valid gift there was an appropriation



A later assumption of right

It is made clear that there can also be appropriation where the D acquires property without stealing it but then later
decides to keep or deal with the property as if they own it. In this case the appropriation takes place at the point of
'keeping' or 'dealing'

SECTION 4 - Property

“property shall be regarded as belonging to any person having possession or control of it, or having in it any
proprietary right or interest.”

Property includes money and all other property real or personal including things in action and other intangible
property

Section 4 lists 5 types of items which are included in the definition of property

1) Money
2) Real property (Land and buildings)
Section 4 (2) states that land can only be stolen in three particular circumstances:

a) Does so in a special capacity such as a trustee or under a power of attorney and deals with it in a way that
b) Someone not in possession of the land
c) Being in possession of the land under tenancy


3) Personal property (Covers all moveable items)

(Kelly and Lindsay) - Ds stole body parts from the royal college of surgeons to make sculptures
It was the personal property of the college for teaching purposes so it was counted as theft

4) Things in action (Does not physically exist but gives the owner legal rights)

- Cheque

5) Other intangible property

- Money in a bank account
- Shares
- Intellectual property

(Oxford v Moss) - D took an exam paper, read the questions and then returned it
D could not be charged for theft of the info on the paper as knowledge can not be stolen

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller happinesstosh. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£2.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart