Supreme Court – 15 markers
What are the most significant factors in the President’s choice of Supreme Court justices?
• Ideological leaning
• Judicial credentials
• The composition of the Senate (to ensure the nominee is voted through – a compromise)
• Ethnicity, gender or race
What is judicial review, and why is it controversial?
• Definition:
o The power of the SC to declare acts of Congress or the executive as
unconstitutional, and thereby null and void
• It is not in the constitution
o It was a power awarded to the court by itself, and thus has no constitutional backing
o People consider this undemocratic
• Through it, the court has become a quasi-legislative body
o The court can effectively amend the constitution and overrule the laws made by
elected officials
o Many see an unelected body having this much power as controversial
o ‘The third house of the legislature in continuous session’
• It has politicised the court by allowing itself to get involved in divisive issues
o Not only can it become involved, but it can overrule the other bodies and rule on the
issue
o Some see this as beneficial, as it ensures that there is an arbitrator to make a final
decision that compromises the two disagreeing sides; however, the majority see it as
wholly undemocratic and too much of an extension of the court’s power
• It has undermined the legitimacy of the court and has led to debate over its role in politics
To what extent have Supreme Court justices reflected the political views of the Presidents who
nominated them?
In what was is the independence of Supreme Court justices protected?
• The separation of powers means the judicial function is vested solely in the court
o It is theoretically free from political interference and thus remains independent of
politics
• The two stage appointment process prevents politicisation
o The fact that both the President and Senate must agree shows some form of
independence from politics, especially in the case of a divided government
• Lifetime tenure
o Have no political agenda in order to try and win re-election, and thus should in theory
always act reasonably and logically, and not vote in a partisan way
• Impeachment must be ratified by both Houses, making politically motivated impeachments
hard and unlikely
Why is the issue of the composition of the Supreme Court so controversial?
• The power it wields
o It is effectively a quasi-legislative body, and people deem this unconstitutional and
undemocratic, especially as it can overturn the rulings of the other two elected
branches
• The life tenure of judges
o Can rarely be held to account, and have the power to accumulate power
o People argue the limits to tenure of office to the President should apply to such a
powerful body
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller maxcollingbourne. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.