100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
How ideologically different are the parties? - essay plan £3.49   Add to cart

Exam (elaborations)

How ideologically different are the parties? - essay plan

7 reviews
 294 views  0 purchase

Complete essay plan; received 100 UMS at A2 level US Politics, and am now at University study Politics. This is a complete essay plan, structured in a way that splits up the questions thematically - rather than simply yes/no - and has substantial debate within each theme, supported by evidence, a...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 4  pages

  • March 1, 2017
  • 4
  • 2016/2017
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Only questions
book image

Book Title:

Author(s):

  • Edition:
  • ISBN:
  • Edition:
All documents for this subject (19)

7  reviews

review-writer-avatar

By: annanya • 1 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: conorg8 • 2 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: fionabowman • 6 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: hmills106 • 6 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: alexgisborne • 7 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: jackbergman707 • 7 year ago

review-writer-avatar

By: hazelbloopley • 7 year ago

avatar-seller
maxcollingbourne
How ideologically different are the parties?

Foreign policy
Ideological:
• Democrats
o More ‘dovish’ with policy, and less willing to involve troops on the ground or to involve
the US at all
o If involvement is needed, targeted airstrikes is the favoured option
o See terrorism as the result of an arrogant US foreign policy, and the best way to deal with
it is through diplomacy and multilateralism, not following interventionism
o Global warming is perceived to be a bigger threat than terrorism
o “Democratic foreign policy is generalized to include concern with human rights, scepticism of
the use of armed force, preference for diplomatic solutions and international engagement” –
Nadeau
• Republicans
o ‘Hawkish’ foreign policy, with direct involvement considered the only viable and successful
policy
o Consider terrorism to be the biggest threat to the security of the US; the use of
intelligence gathering methods are justified, despite them temporarily suspending
personal civil liberties

In reality:
• Differences
o Obama campaigned on a dovish platform propounding multilateralism and diplomacy,
stating he wanted to “renew American diplomacy”, and the mantra that “we will hold out our
hand if you unclench your fist”
o His positive attitude towards working with the UN echoed elements of Wilsonian
idealism, and his favouring of ‘soft diplomacy’ won him the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize for
creating a ‘new climate’ in international relations
§ He signed the START Treaty with Russia in 2010, that reduced each nation’s
nuclear missile launchers
§ He announced a deal with Iran in 2015, that had been in negotiation since 2012
stated the US would lift sanctions if Iran agreed to limit its nuclear programme – the
deal took effect in 2016
§ He has consistently entrusted Secretary of State John Kerry with peaceful
negotiations, such as with Russian ministers during the Ukraine crisis, and with al-
Assad in 2013 during the Syrian civil war
o Obama has also sought to change the direction of US foreign policy from the Bush
Doctrine:
§ Although unsuccessful, his attempts to close Guantanamo Bay showed intent for
change
o The Republicans have maintained their interventionist and hawkish policy, and have
criticised the Democrats’ foreign policy as being ‘a disaster for America’
§ Rick Santorum, Rick Perry and Scott Walker were all advocates of deploying
10,000 ground troops to deal with ISIS

• Similarities:
o Peter Keaver (2012) argued that all of Obama’s major foreign policy successes have
come as a result of continuing the interventionist Bush Doctrine, despite his campaign
pledge for multilateralism
§ Intervention in Afghanistan increased, with 80% more troops being sent out, and
his supplying of troops to support the counter-insurgency against the Taliban
was the same option recommended by Bush in 2008
§ His increasing of the US naval presence in the Asia-Pacific area and
strengthening relations with powers such as India – in order to offset the
geopolitical influence of China – was also a continuation of Bush’s regional
strategy

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller maxcollingbourne. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £3.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

84866 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£3.49
  • (7)
  Add to cart