X.a. Causation - Power metaphysics conceiving of modality
as feature of world ≠ grounding modality in
- Causation occurring in manifestation of
truths of other worlds
powers
- Single world in powers view one-world
- Causation involving reciprocal mutual
manifestation partners doing action solely natural modality (i.e., struck match lighting
≠ transforming into chicken due to
possible as result of concert action (Martin)
- Causation exhibiting dispositional modality: existence/absence of natural causal power
for effect)
causes tending producing effects type-
- Effect naturally necessary in absence of
causal claims ≠ universal regularities (i.e.,
power stopping effect from occurring
heavy rains tending causing flooding with
- Dispositional theories of modality (Borghini,
few exceptions)
Williams, Jacobs & Vetter)
o Singular causal claims: cause/power
- Controversy: truly dispositional theory used
only tending towards effect &
for delivering modal logic based on
succeeding in producing effect on
classical framework due to putatively
occasion
radical character of theory
- Separation causal production &
- Classical modal logic reliant on modal
necessitarianism
values of necessity & possibility
- Dispositionalism accepting causes as
- Tendency = third modal value between
genuinely producing effects without
necessity & pure possibility question
necessity ( rejecting Principle of Sufficient
feasibility of tendency in standard modal
Reason, see Mumford & Anjum)
frameworks (Anjum & Mumford)
- Powers causing manifestations & causes =
- Problem: case of fink (Martin) for
power manifesting itself theory of
understanding of causation as power for
causation where causation conceived as
effect grounded in possibility of effect
primitive (= unanalysable)
- Response: tendency view solving fink case
- Symptoms of causation detected by
requirement accepting third modal value
methods of science as evidence of causal
of tendency
connection (Mumford & Anjum)
X.c. Laws of nature
- Powers = truthmakers of causal laws (Bird)
- ≠ place/need for laws in power metaphysics
(Mumford)
o De-powered/de-animated laws of
nature entering philosophical &
scientific thinking after rejection of
powers view for filling explanatory gap
in ontology
o Problem: explaining nature + function +
role in model of law of nature
Laws of nature = mere descriptions
of behaviour irrelevant
X.b. Modality X.d. Free will
- Determinism = enslavement to necessity
≠ freedom/choice/alternative possibility
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller emmalmartinelli. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £6.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.