Describe and evaluate (informative social influence and normative social influence) as
explanations for conformity (16 Marks)
A03:
A strength of informative social influence is that it has research support. Lucas (2006) asked students
for answers to maths problems that were easy or difficult, there was more conformity to incorrect
answers when they were more difficult. This supports informative social influence because as the
task difficulty increases the students wanted to be correct and they believed the answers of the
other students were right, so they conformed with them as they wanted to be right, students
doubted they were right.
A limitation of normative social influence is that it doesn’t necessarily affect everyone’s behaviour in
the same way. For example, nAffiliators are people who have a greater need for affiliation I.e., to be
in a relationship with others. Therefore, nAffiliators are more likely to conform due to normative
social influence to be accepted by others, than those who do not have this need for affiliation. This is
a problem for the theory because it is not as straightforward as originally thought and normative
social influence is not the same for everyone. Normative social influence may be an explanation for
conformity for certain types of people but no others.
A strength of normative social influence is that it has research support. For example, in Asch’s study,
many participants went along with a wrong answer because other people did. This was supported by
them saying that they were afraid of disapproval. This supports normative social influence because
the participants wanted to be accepted and avoid their social disapproval. This is further supported
by the fact that the conformity was less if they wrote their answer down. Writing down the answer
the participant doesn’t have to share what they wrote. Therefore, this relates to normative social
influence as there would be no social disapproval.
A strength of both informative social influence and normative social influence is that they work
together. The original 2 process model suggested that conformity had to be either due to normative
social influence or informative social influence. However, this has not been criticised, and it is likely
that often both processes could be involved. For example, in Asch’s study, conformity is reduced
when there is one other dissenter (a non-conforming person). The unanimity then decreases as it
isn’t now only one person is not conforming. It reduces power of normative social influence as there
is social support. Therefore, we cannot be sure that the concept of these working as separate factors
can be supported, and it is very difficult to separate them out.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller gracebrosnan14. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £2.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.