100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Previously searched by you
Previously searched by you
logo
Contract Law - Frustration (Exam Plan) £5.99   Add to cart
Quickly navigate to
Preview
  2.  
  3. University Of Law (ULaw)
  4.  
  5. Contract Law

Exam (elaborations)

Contract Law - Frustration (Exam Plan)
 12 views  0 purchase

I scored 75% in Contract Law and received a Distinction (74%) overall in the GDL at the University of Law using these notes. These notes are written in the form of step-by-step exam plans. Compared to standard notes, this will save you lots of time. Most people will make notes during workshops, ...

[Show more]

Preview 2 out of 7  pages

Document information

  • July 20, 2023
  • 7
  • 2021/2022
  • Exam (elaborations)
  • Questions & answers

Subjects

Written for

All documents for this subject (23)

Seller

avatar-seller
lawnotes08

Reviews received

Content preview

Contract Law - Frustration

[STEP 1]: Identify contracting parties

There is a contract between C and D for [INSERT CONSIDERATION FROM ONE
PARTY]. However, Y happens, preventing the contract being fulfilled.

[STEP 2]: General rule

The general rule of absolute obligations is that if a party assumes an absolute
obligation, they are liable for breach of contract even if circumstances make
performance of the obligation impossible (Paradine v Jane).

[STEP 3]: Set up claim of frustration

X could rely on an exception to the general rule and claim that the contract was
frustrated in order to avoid liability for breach of contract for [INSERT CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATION X HAS NOT FULFILLED].

[STEP 4]: Is there frustration?

Is there frustration?

Frustration occurs when:

- A supervening event renders the contract impossible to perform, or radically
different (Davis Contractors Ltd v Fareham UDC);
- is beyond the control of the parties (Maritime Fish Ltd v Ocean Trawlers Ltd);
- occurs after the contract is formed; and
- is unforeseen.

Supervening event rendering the contract impossible to perform or radically different

- An event will not frustrate a contract if the contract merely becomes more difficult
to perform, but not impossible or radically different (Davis Contractors Ltd).

- The unavailability of a thing vital to the performance of the contract can cause
frustration, such as a venue (Taylor v Caldwell).

, - The unavailability of a person vital to the performance of the contract can
frustrate a contract, such as a music-hall artist (Morgan v Manser) or drummer in
a pop group (Condor v Barron Knights).

- An event will not frustrate the contract if it renders the essential person
unavailable for an insignificant period of time.

- Non-occurrence of a fundamental event can lead to frustration (Krell v Henry).
However, non-occurrence of the fundamental event must mean that the
foundation or basis of the contract cannot be accomplished to cause frustration
of the contract (Herne Bay Steamboat Co v Hutton).

- Government intervention may frustrate a contract, if it has the effect of making
performance of the contract impossible or radically different from what the parties
originally envisaged (Metropolitan Water Board v Dick Kerr and Company).

- A contract may be frustrated if performing it becomes illegal (Fibrosa).

- A contract for a lease of land can be frustrated, but it is rare and the court will
consider the length of the lease and how long the party is deprived of the use of
the property (National Carriers v Panalpina).
- In Panalpina, not being able to use property for two years in a ten year
lease was held not to be a frustrating event.

- Delay may cause frustration of a contract, but the court must consider (as per
Metropolitan Water Board):
- The likely length of the delay; and
- Whether the delay causes the contract to become radically different.

Length of delay
- The longer the likely delay, the more likely the court will find the contract is
frustrated.

Radically different?
- In Metropolitan Water Board, the contract was frustrated because if the contract
to build a reservoir was resumed after the end of WWI as stipulated by the
Government, it would be radically different.
- When the closure of the Suez Canal increased shipping times, a sellers’ contract
was not frustrated as it had become more difficult and expensive for sellers, but
the contract could still be performed and had not become radically different
(Tsakiroglou & Co Ltd).

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller lawnotes08. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £5.99. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

72042 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£5.99
  • (0)
  Add to cart