100% satisfaction guarantee Immediately available after payment Both online and in PDF No strings attached
logo-home
Describe and evaluate Working Memory Model 16 marks: Essay Plan £3.59   Add to cart

Essay

Describe and evaluate Working Memory Model 16 marks: Essay Plan

 4 views  0 purchase
  • Institution
  • AQA

This detailed essay plan has 4 main points that construct the 4 paragraphs for your essay. Each paragraph follows a point, evidence, explanation (P. E.E.) technique with support studies (e.g Shallice and Warrington 1970 KF, dual task performance experiments) and further evaluation of the results...

[Show more]

Preview 1 out of 1  pages

  • July 27, 2023
  • 1
  • 2022/2023
  • Essay
  • Unknown
  • A+
All documents for this subject (455)
avatar-seller
sofiamorgulchik
1. Description.
A01: Baddeley and Hitch (1974) - Central executive - key component of the model.
Directs attention to particular tasks, determining how the brain 'resources' are
allocated to tasks. Limited capacity, cannot attend to many things at once. Pl, VSS
A03: Explains dual tasks performance. Give participants (pps) visual and auditory
tasks simultaneously and measure their performance. If both tasks involved one
processing system such as repeating "the the the" aloud and reading a text (PL) then
the performance was poorer due to the stores limited capacity. If the tasts required
different stores, performance would be unaffected. These observations provided
evidence to suggest the existence of different limited capacity STM stores - PL and
VSS

2. Notion of separate stores within STM
A01: Shallice and Warrington (1970) KF, whose short-term memory of auditory
information was much worse than of visual. In addition, his auditory problems were
limited to verbal material such as letters but not meaningful sound. Thus, his brain
damage seemed to be restricted to the phonological loop. Supports the claim that
separate STM stores manage phonological and visual memories. A better account of
STM that the STM component of MSM.
A03: However, evidence from brain-damage patients is sometimes unreliable. The
process of brain injury is very traumatic, which may in itself change behaviour so that
person performs worse on certain tasks. They can have difficulties paying attention
so underperform. Results of certain individuals cannot be generalised to the whole
population. Limitation because the key supporting research comes from case studies
of individual who suffered serious brain damage.

3. WWM explain lots of real-world observations.
A strength lies in the phonological loop and its explanation of the word-length effect
(the fact that people cope better with short words than long words in working memory
(STM). Capacity of PL - 2 seconds of information. The longer words can't be
rehearsed in the phonological loop because they don't fit. However, if a person is
given an articulatory suppression task, the word-length effect disappears. This
repetitive task ties up the articulatory process and means you can't rehearse the
shorter words more quickly than the longer ones, so the word-length effect
disappears. The evidence for the articulatory process.

4. Central executive is too vague and it is just a concept of attention.
Critics also feel that the notion of a single central executive is wrong and it is seen as
multiple components. A patient after a brain surgery performed well on reasoning
tests, which suggest that his central executive was intact. He had poor decision-
making skills, which implies that in fact his CE was partially impaired. The account
offered of the CE by the model is unsatisfactory because it is probably more
complex.

The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Guaranteed quality through customer reviews

Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.

Quick and easy check-out

Quick and easy check-out

You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.

Focus on what matters

Focus on what matters

Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!

Frequently asked questions

What do I get when I buy this document?

You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.

Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?

Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.

Who am I buying these notes from?

Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sofiamorgulchik. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.

Will I be stuck with a subscription?

No, you only buy these notes for £3.59. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.

Can Stuvia be trusted?

4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)

79064 documents were sold in the last 30 days

Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now

Start selling
£3.59
  • (0)
  Add to cart