This document lists all the key research (and the researchers) along with evaluations of each according to AQA specifications for the Social Influence topic. It is a summary and simplification of psychological research with key figures and names to remember to enhance your ability to reach top-leve...
Asch’s “Line experiment” (1951)
Aim: To investigate conformity to a majority.
Procedure: Lab experiment.
➢ 123 male American participants.
➢ 5-8 confederates with 1 naive participant.
➢ Each was asked to point out the matching line.
➢ 12 critical trials of 18.
Findings: Conformity occurred in 37% of the trials.
3 confederates led to the most conformity.
Conclusion: Conformity to a majority is likely even with an unambiguous task.
– Low population validity as it only used male Americans.
– Artificial task; lowered external validity.
– Ethical issue of deception by making participants think it was an eye test.
– Lacks historical validity as it was performed in a conformist time in America.
Asch’s variations -
Presence of a non-conforming confederate: Conformity decreased.
Increasing confederate size: Conformity increased.
Making the task more ambiguous: Conformity increased.
Zimbardo’s “Stanford Prison Experiment” (1973)
Aim: To investigate conformity to a social role.
Procedure: Lab experiment.
➢ 24 male American university students.
➢ Randomly assigned to “guard” and “prisoner” roles.
➢ Made as realistic as possible with “prisoners” being “arrested” and “guards” receiving their
shift timetable. Zimbardo himself played “superintendent”.
➢ Guards wore reflective sunglasses to lessen their ability to connect with the prisoners, and the
prisoners wore identical uniforms and hair covers to enhance deindividuation.
Findings: All participants conformed to their roles.
Conclusion: Supported his situational hypothesis that the environment makes people behave this
way rather than dispositional factors of personality.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller sxpphire. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.