Exam (elaborations)
Essay plans - Government and Politics in the US
- Institution
- AQA
9 markers & 25 markers essay plans for topics listed in AQA Government and Politics A-level Paper 2
[Show more]
Seller
Follow
Content preview
The US Judiciary - RevisionExplain and analyze 3 problems in the nomination process. (9)
P – presidents politicise it
Ex – ideology important, court judicial, appointed by politicians, bias, translates through to decisions.
Ev – Trump’s election, reshapes, appoints 2 cons, Kavanaugh & Gorsuch. Bush ‘I don’t like libs’.
An – shift the balance of the court both ways, but can be seen as overreach as most decisions 9-0
P – senate politicises it.
Ex – confirmation powers, senators attack > probing, opposing side is defensive over evaluative.
Ev – Alito’s nomination in 2006, all (R) aye and all (D) nay. BUT Breyer (lib) had all on side.
An – increasing partisanship, BUT silent role, 63/100 voice votes 9% rejected on basis of merit.
P – influence from media + interest groups.
Ex – emergence 24/7, portray candidates in a specific light which can undermine/uplift nomination.
Ev – Sotomayor, ‘Alliance for Justice’ PG experienced v. Judicial Confirmation NW’ judicial activist.
An – starts assumptions, backed by law enforcements, demonstrates its not a huge problem.
Explain and analyze 3 ways judges are biased/neutral (9)
P – power of ‘judicial review’
Ex – rule on splitting issues, M v M, ‘activist’ strike down federal/state laws and ‘restraint’ interpret.
Ev – DC v. Heller, operative cause of owning guns > militia alter ideology based on favored outcome.
An – reiterated McDonald v. Chicago, BUT 2yrs late same balance politically showing bias.
P – affect presidential power.
Ex – expand/limit, remove right to carry out action or by upholding the right to carry out an action.
Ev – Burger court, loose, Jimmy Carter (D) Goldwater v. Carter terminates international treaty.
An – displays political bias BUT Rehnquist court held (R) Bush accountable with Guantanamo cases.
P – presidents politicise it.
Ex – ideology important, court judicial, appointed by politicians, bias, translates through to decisions.
Ev – Trump’s election, reshape it appoints 2 cons, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch. Bush ‘I don’t libs.’
An – exec pick not successful, (R) Bush appointed Souter, he became unexpectedly liberal member.
Explain and analyze ways judges are independent. (9)
P – majority/minority opinions.
Ex – used oral, majority supporting court’s judgement, minority dissenting one, difference = ind.
Ev – Heller Scalia majority, 2nd must be read with 1st, 4th, 5th, 9th Stevens minority ‘bear arms’ idiom.
An – ‘amend’ constitution independently BUT ‘legislation from the bench’ displays bias.
, The US Judiciary - Revision
P – differ in ideology.
Ex – for judges lacking ind, ideological, exec pick on ‘loose’ or ‘strict’, some turn out independent.
Ev – Stevens, most liberal judge by Ford on basis of conservatism, looking at his records.
An – occurred multiple times, swing is evident in Cons picks of Trump’s Gorsuch BUT majority stick.
P – power of ‘judicial review’
Ex – rule on splitting issues, M v M, ‘activist’ strike down federal/state laws and ‘restraint’ interpret.
Ev – DC v. Heller, operative cause of owning guns > militia alter ideology based on favored outcome.
An – McDonald v. Chicago, neutrality BUT 2yrs late same balance politically showing bias.
Explain and analyze 3 ways the court is considered a political institution. (9)
P – power of ‘judicial review’
Ex – rule on splitting issues, M v M, ‘activist’ strike down federal/state laws and ‘restraint’ interpret.
Ev – DC v. Heller, operative cause of owning guns > militia alter ideology based on favored outcome.
An – reiterated McDonald v. Chicago, consideration, BUT 2yrs late same balance showing bias.
P – affect presidential power.
Ex – expand/limit, remove right to carry out action or by upholding the right to carry out an action.
Ev – Burger court, loose, Jimmy Carter (D) Goldwater v. Carter terminates international treaty.
An – displays political bias BUT Rehnquist court held (R) Bush accountable with Guantanamo cases.
P – presidents politicise it
Ex – ideology important, court judicial, appointed by politicians, bias, translates through to decisions.
Ev – Trump’s election, reshape it appoints 2 cons, Kavanaugh and Gorsuch. Bush ‘I don’t like lib.’
An – shift the balance of the court both ways, but can be seen as overreach as most decisions 9-0
Explain and analyze 3 ways the judges are powerful. (9)
P – power of ‘judicial review’
Ex – rule on splitting issues, M v M, ‘activist’ strike down federal/state laws and ‘restraint’ interpret.
Ev – DC v. Heller, operative cause of owning guns > militia alter ideology based on favored outcome.
An – McDonald v. Chicago, consideration, BUT 2yrs late same balance politically showing bias.
P – affect presidential power.
Ex – expand/limit, remove right to carry out action or by upholding the right to carry out an action.
Ev – Burger court, loose, Jimmy Carter (D) Goldwater v. Carter terminates international treaty.
An – political bias BUT Rehnquist court held (R) Bush accountable w/ Guantanamo, Rasul v Bush.
P – upholding of rights.
The benefits of buying summaries with Stuvia:
Guaranteed quality through customer reviews
Stuvia customers have reviewed more than 700,000 summaries. This how you know that you are buying the best documents.
Quick and easy check-out
You can quickly pay through credit card for the summaries. There is no membership needed.
Focus on what matters
Your fellow students write the study notes themselves, which is why the documents are always reliable and up-to-date. This ensures you quickly get to the core!
Frequently asked questions
What do I get when I buy this document?
You get a PDF, available immediately after your purchase. The purchased document is accessible anytime, anywhere and indefinitely through your profile.
Satisfaction guarantee: how does it work?
Our satisfaction guarantee ensures that you always find a study document that suits you well. You fill out a form, and our customer service team takes care of the rest.
Who am I buying these notes from?
Stuvia is a marketplace, so you are not buying this document from us, but from seller manalahmed. Stuvia facilitates payment to the seller.
Will I be stuck with a subscription?
No, you only buy these notes for £7.49. You're not tied to anything after your purchase.
Can Stuvia be trusted?
4.6 stars on Google & Trustpilot (+1000 reviews)
75632 documents were sold in the last 30 days
Founded in 2010, the go-to place to buy revision notes and other study material for 14 years now